Eurofighter Typhoon (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion (Part 2)

Oh alright, didn’t see an update like 30 minutes ago tho on Steam (or it was just finished to fast lol)

Maybe then idk

How do you mess that up…

Zusammenfassung

Its now live since ~ 6 1/2 hours

Oh damn lol, maybe I need to go to the eyedoc again

Hmm Gripen loadout bug doesnt seem to be fixed from the looks of it

Welcome to Snail Entertainment

my_precious

vanga

It would be roughly accurate for PESAs and i wouldn’t put it beyond gaijin to ahistorically nerf AESAs lol

really?


@Balta779517-live

3 Likes

Raven seems to be fixed now tho amazing


? 9B1101 was monopulse which has functionally the same result.

2 Likes
Spoiler

image
image

image

2 Likes

“i made them up for dramatic effect”

not a valid source

image

Buddy the seeker couldn’t see things down that low, think about it how does it get around the effect of well the aircraft or target and the ground looking the same? Every other missile with low altitude capability uses a inverse mono pulse seeker.

It is designed as said for BVR not for both.

It’s a google translate of a page from a Russian manual,

Your source for that is?

Seeker architecture, it has no way to differentiate or perhaps it can be explained why Russia didn’t need to go to an inverse mono pulse seeker but the rest of the world did to use SARHMs at targets flying low. Russian aircraft at the time the 29 would have had a PD Radar.

The ET definitely the but the R-27R how did it do it?