If going to fix this bug, I really hope also fix the issue where AESA-equipped aircraft can’t switch between TRK PD and TRK while in STT.
Yeah… Radars need a generous amount of work
the radar and IRST are coded as a single sensor, im pretty sure thats the norm, so they probably share gimbal limits?
Probably just a result of the auto PRF handling.
1 Like
They do not share them, the limits are separate, however I can see a possible issue. Radar, IRST and HMD have separate track limits, so it’s possible it is not properly switching to the IRST track limits.
1 Like
“HDN” radar
look inside
hardest to notch???
Yeah HPRF provides extremely strong signal to the target making it harder to notch once the target is in CW
MBC notch filter is turned off in lookup which helps the most. But does mean you can be chaffed pretty easily.
1 Like
win
4 Likes
Nice, now welcome to stock grind pain. Definetly a lot harder than the last one was, at least until you get the early few essentials.
With all the AESAs, its impossible to be sneaky
nope im broke
will stock grind soon though
Ah damn, time to play some NRB :P
(At least thats how I power grind SLs)
So it will sustain M5+ for what minimum 30 seconds? That’s pretty cool.
Does anyone have any data on the R-27ER missile we need to bug report this to get it’s performance reduced to real world levels.
Within 8km it’s a free kill no chance of chaffing/notching it and unless you are MPing you just die.
No other SARHM in the game as Chaff resistance like it. Clearly it is not modelled realistically when we consider how poor it’s real world performances have been. The design and architecture of the seeker and the quality of Soviet electronics for the time period.
I should not be able to defeat an IRIS-T SLM easier than I can a late 80s SARHM.
There is no way that’s true, that would mean it travels 50km in that time
Well a few tens is at least 20 seconds. Assuming EFT’s max launch alt of 55,000 ft and no loft even with that you go like 30km. Which by the way exceeds MBDA’s baseline 25km+ figure.
First of all, bring this to the r-27 thread lol, this is the eurofighter thread.
Second of all, r-27er basically matches its range charts (actually slightly underperforms but it’s close enough, @DirectSupport could attest to that).
Its seekerhead in terms of notch resistance is actually underperforming, as predecessors of missiles like it, for example the r-40r, has a much lower notch gate than it for some reason (±7m/s irl!) but it’s not unique in this underperformance (Skyflash for example should be ±3 knots if I remember right)
It’s datalink is overperforming, as irl it’s not able to resume datalink once interrupted for more than 3 seconds, but it’s a convention for datalink reconnect to be a thing for fox 1 datalink sarh missiles (see aim7p)
1 Like
The actual issue is chaff is underperforming (horrifically at that) making everything difficult to dodge. ARH missiles just have gigantic notch gates which makes it less of an issue.
8 Likes
No not talking kinematics, yes appreciate it’s fast and can be guided by DL but in game it is near impossible to defeat and that is wrong when you can chaff a 120 at 4km away why should an R-27ER be so lethal?
It is poorly implemented and needs to be readjusted to bring it inline with realistic performance (and I’m not even including the it cannot be launched under 3000ft)
They are horrendous, it’s mad to think a SARHM could and is more dangerous than an ARHM. I understand from gameplay/balance well you have to guide this and the other is FnF but come on no one is sitting here thinking yes of course R-27s are the best missile ever made.