Well considering I won a BVR duel against an SM2 with my CAPTOR-F 2000 Watt microwave vs his super turbo fantasy performance PESA radar.
So that radar MUST be bugged since it has every single advantage in the BVR (or WVR too).
Anyone saying SPICE bombs are bad is either:
A. Bad themselves
B. Have no idea what they’re talking about
C. Have never used SPICE/glide bombs
D. All of the above
you know that the Irbis is underperforming in range?
1 Like
It’s overperforming for its current scan regions. 400km is only achievable in a 10x10 degree scan. Your own screenshot says this is for a “narrow viewing sector”. 200km otherwise.
It also scans impossibly fast (but gaijin doesn’t accept reports based on calculations lol)
7 Likes
“I do not believe that is accurate.”
“In fact that just seems like clear marketing lies to me anyway.”
Sorry, that seems to be the accepted, immediate, response as soon as someone brings up sources on radar performance
3 Likes
Could be spaded vs stock, helps a lot when it comes to defending.
But also every chance he was just a bad player. Had a rafale earlier just fly in a perfectly straight line whilst I hard locked them and then splashed them with a Aim-120C5
Can anyone check if I am looking at this correctly?
Somehow both the PESA Irbis, and the friggin’ garbage CAPTOR-M seem to sweep a 30° S I G N I F I C A N T L Y faster than CAPTOR-E?
N035 (Irbis-E) on TWS Medium pattern
"radarTwsMedium": {
"type": "pyramide",
"azimuthLimits": [
-120.0,
120.0
],
"elevationLimits": [
-60.0,
60.0
],
"rollStabLimit": 180.0,
"pitchStabLimit": 60.0,
"period": 1.531038,
"width": 30.0,
"barHeight": 1.667,
"barsCount": 5,
"rowMajor": true,
"preciseMinor": true,
"tws": true
},
ECSR Mk1 (CAPTOR-E) on TWS Medium pattern
"twsMedium": {
"type": "pyramide",
"azimuthLimits": [
-90.0,
90.0
],
"elevationLimits": [
-90.0,
90.0
],
"rollStabLimit": 180.0,
"pitchStabLimit": 90.0,
"period": 3.9,
"width": 30.0,
"barHeight": 2.5,
"barsCount": 12,
"rowMajor": true,
"preciseMinor": true,
"tws": true
},
CAPTOR-M on TWS Wide
"twsWide": {
"type": "pyramide",
"azimuthLimits": [
-70.0,
70.0
],
"elevationLimits": [
-60.0,
60.0
],
"rollStabLimit": 180.0,
"pitchStabLimit": 60.0,
"period": 1.7,
"width": 30.0,
"barHeight": 2.1,
"barsCount": 2,
"rowMajor": true,
"preciseMinor": true,
"tws": true
},
Might be the bar count. ECRS has a lot more.
how is it impossibly fast?
1 Like
Bar count and elevation limits. ECRS is scanning a significantly larger area
1 Like
The scan rate as it stands is nearly identical (they both sit in the 190~195 range)
how do the bars work? how is the actual scan speed derived from that?
I have no idea, I could never get my head round the bars and stuff
I like flanker chan as much as any other guy, but you cannot take his calculations as fact. his calculations change over time. just look at his rcs sims for example
Scan speed is (width*2)/(period/barcount) iirc
To clarify this, it is not 30, it is 60 wide, you have to multiply it by 2.
Next is bar count, it is different, irbis has 4 bars, ECRS 12.
If do the simple math of scan width (60)*bars, and then we divide it by the scan rate, we get
196 degree/s for Irbis
184 degree/s for ECRS.
Sure but that’s a matter of margin of error. The probability of being out by a factor of 2 (90.5 vs 195) is… immensely low. Even if you assume some assumed numbers are wrong.
he’s just a guy on the internet lmao, he’s not a proper source.
the 200km range in question:
1 Like