No definetly the rMax, you can see the rMin at the bottom. Get it all the time. The LSZ being bigger than the rMax
Oh, that…
Yeah thats messed up.
i think thats due to gaijin not actively calculating that stuff on the go, but rather have a pre made value sheet that the game refrences
I’ve had this for a while, this was a while ago but I somehow dont think the Aim-120C5 has a bigger LSZ than a METEOR
1 Like
Probably, its why Skyflash STs dont have LSZ yet on the F3. Its done on a missile by missile basis, but its pretty clear that something is very wrong with C5s
because both seekers are round
because one is round and one is pointy (like ASRAAM and CAMM)
What Are the scan sizes of TWS for captor e?
copy pasted from the Captor-M knowing gaijin
Yes, but 27R is 1,9 while 27T is 2,425; i cant just throw +0,525 of CX on CAMM spec
i mean to be fair, they probably just adjust drag for each missile to meet its launch specifications (as we have launch data for both r-27r and t, and by simply adjust drag they can make it meet those launch conditions). while asraam, i doubt we have launch ranges/conditions for it
Spoiler
1 Like
Boys, I suggest you start collecting all the docs you can for the dev server.
For a quick reporting spree.
I think Gunjob and Flame have been preparing for years.
2 Likes
If there would be a subscription for his work - I’d pay.
I’ll personally ready to come under every bugreport of them and scream “HELL YEA”
1 Like
Roughly about 1.05/s a bar, so 4.20/s for a full 4 bar +/-100°. With a mech scan rate 190°/s.
The E-Scan rate is 571°/s.
4 Likes
Its a Speedy Boiii ))
With other E-scans in game sitting at about 220? damn.
Holy refresh rate
Lofting is advertised on both variants of the missile. It’s also the only way for it to reach the correct range parameters, especially if burn time is decreased (while keeping overall deltaV)
Both the MICA IR and ASRAAM would have slightly higher drag. Iirc ASRAAM should have very slightly less deltaV than CAMM since the later has a (very) small booster to give it some speed in ground launch configuration - although the small weight difference could be accounted this way ?
Probably has to do with the speed of the munitions ig. Or the 27mm has a placeholder value while Vulcan has better precision ?
MICA has one of the largest drag coefficient. Seeing as the ASRAAM is an even faster missile and gaijin’s drag model is very crude, it might get a similar or even greater drag (plus the fact that it has a less aerodynamic seeker)
Isn’t the E SCAN of current ESA radars just guesswork tho ? With the devs claiming that they « physically could not scan any faster » ?
1 Like
My figure isn’t guess work though, its based on information on CAESAR and lines up with the BAE Simulation produced for ECRS. I can’t speak to the other E-Scan radars in game, not something I’ve spent time looking into.
1 Like