Radar:
Says Su-27 to the J-11B makes sense…
RWR: Runs them under Mig-29, oh, and the J-11B is missing
do you have any source saying the french one CANNOT take 8 micas? youre the one advocating they be removed so the burden of proof falls on you
youd still bug report it, rather than letting it be a gameplay balance thing, and if not you, than any one of the eurofighter fanboys will
and theres the british trials saying the 9M is defeated by slow rise flares, so
i have, if you would like to go back and read my points, youll see in plain text why having 18 fire and forget brimstones that ignore smoke, would be bad for gameplay
how about we just remove brimstones entirely
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/946390096997912647/1424965847427973202/Frances_New_AASM_XLR_Smart_Bomb_Doubles_the_Rafale_Fighters_Strike_Range-a6f781f4.png?ex=68e92a1c&is=68e7d89c&hm=4d67a735ccc59f21babf55f63f6e8f1d0086489ce22a93bae177628d9fbeeea3& they were shown off at the paris air show just this year, so youd be 100% okay with this with no way to decoy them
yes, a max of 6 KH-38s, and id be okay with the 38T getting removed, but they wont so whatever
if they were arhs then you would but no one has 5th gen IR missiles, so (tho mica IR would still beat them)
i have a LOT of experience with 9Ms, maybe not as much as you, granted, but enough to know exactly what i am talking about,
good luck hitting anything at 15km.
a single photograph thats not backed up by use in real life
this also exists
3 Likes
iirc the N001 the Su-27/J-11/J-11A use is basicly an upscaled N019 from the MiG-29, which is why they all come up as MiG-29 in RWR. Just something you gotta play around.
Its even worse if you use cockpit displays, since in their infinite wisdom, gaijin use different RWR threat databases for the in-game overlay and the MFD display, which is increadibly problematic, since you end up with most new aircrafts being added just showing up as a “?” in cockpit even if the RWR can ID the threat -_-
1 Like
Proving a negative… wow. Good job there.
I guess you’ll have to provide a primary doc stating the Typhoon cannot carry 18x Brimstones.
As has been stated. Gunjob’s doc. Hes probably already provided it in his internal report/suggestion as a senior tech mod. Nothing to report.
But sure… Keep complaining.
Yep, and? We dont have those in game yet. There is also docs for additional modes of IRCCM not modeled. But kinda a mute point. We should have ASRAAM not Aim-9Ms.
Again, please go back and re-read previous comments, you are the only one saying that we would have 18x FnF.
Sure, along with AASM. Still have yet to see a single primary doc that states they can track a moving target like they can in game.
Kinematically, they are the same and no they wouldnt. ASRAAM beats MICA IR beyond point blank range and IRIS-T beats MICA IR at point blank range.
I know, shock horror, French weapon system isnt defacto the best.
Then Id suggest paying attention next time.
Never said you can. Lock range =/= kinematic range. But 6-8km in a headon, at alt… 100% possible. Maximise the advantage of the smokeless motor.
and?
Like the mockups of the Rafale with 8x MICA EM.
3 wing pylons for A2G.
inner usually runs dual PW4s
middle usually runs external fuel tank
outer usually runs Brimstones.
taking both PW4s and Brimstones maximises flexibility and loadout effeciency. Especially in operations against mostly soft targets. If anything were to go hot in the east. You can bet that youd have Typhoons with 12-18x Brimstones 3s deployed
but talking to you is just talking in circles.
So if you want. try and bug report the typhoon only having 6-12x Brimstones. FnF will come sooner rather than later to the Typhoon.
1 Like
thats how I noticed it, because something was an U on Cockpit RWR, while my Radar could ID it as Su-27
I’ve blocked that guy. Clearly just trolling at this point.
Some people really dont like the idea of the Typhoon being modeled Historically accurately
5 Likes
Yeah, and they aint in a rush to fix it either…
Tbf, the last report for the missing NCTR database update was fixed pretty fast
you literally told me to prove a negative first earlier lmao
you said there were documents to support it having 18, but wont show them
you do enough senseless complaining for the both of us
we do lol
same with magic 2 oh well
and we should have mica ir, not magic 2s
youre advocating for both 18 brimstones and mmw capability, 1+1 = 2
documents make mention of mid course corrections for moving targets
tell me, whats the suspected range of the asraam
i do, and havent had any issues
where are the mockups? all ive seen is actual flying examples
at no point have i ever argued against the typhoon ever having fire and forget missiles, ive been arguing against them getting 18 missiles with no counterplay
youre absolutely right, but not for the reason you think
My god, get your ass over there if you 2 want fight…
1 Like
NCTR or RWR? Cuz NCTR is for the radar
I know, thats why I said NCTR…
why not just add the chaff smokes to everything past a certain br
Well we were talking about the in-cockpit RWR threat database, so bringing up NCTR was out of left field
Not realy, the NCTR had an similar issue,>missing planes…)))))
something to do with the GHz right? i kind of doubt its actually that impervious, if its true then they can just make chaff smokes cover all mmw weaponry
1 Like
This is what has been stated.
Just like how Gaijin doesnt really model IR signatures properly or the fact that every single smoke bar ESS blocks TVD (even those on WW2 tanks as far as I am aware) Im guessing that theyd add Chaff-Smoke that blocks all MMW.
itd be better if they just limited it to 6 missiles and can smoke, that puts it in parody with every other cas jet