Just wish we had something better than TIALD. Though the idea of using a harrier (any harrier) against an IRIS-T, Aim-9X or Python 5 would fill me with dread at the moment .Especailly without BOL
It benefits from the same thing the EF does: our MAW doesn’t suck. Most jets just get folded because IRIS-T/9X/P5 are near-zero signature and clouds block IR MAW. Simply being aware of the threat is already huge even if BOLs are mediocre.
1 Like
Yeah but the thing is Harrier is also slow, even slower than F-18 which gives you much smaller window to send your agm against SPAA’s and defend it.
1 Like
Is it just me or does the EF feel really… heavy in a fight against a hornet? I mean for having something like a 50% higher TWR it is exceptionally hard to pull away in a climb.
1 Like
We use to have an issue where we lost excessive amounts of thrust for an extended period of time after any maneuver. It might be that.
on today’s episode of “most advanced ESM suite in the game doesnt know what a semi active radar homing seeker is”
I’m manually using the chaff. The MAW is dropping the flares.
Still waiting on a response for that report…
On an unrelated note, how come target A is yellow?
1 Like
I guess thats fair considering sweden doesn’t have any F-18’s as they built Gripens instead ;)
1 Like
In all fairness this isn’t the NCTR, the MFD is just broken beyond belief.
1 Like
I think it’s less the language and more trying to fit БАГАТОТРД in that tiny space. I think MULTIJET would do the same thing on your end.