Probably would be available for both.
Stirker II upgrades things like:
So Striker 1 probably would also display known missile contacts just like it does with radar contacts and like it should with IFF DL stuff.
I’ll look into it. Anyway the MAW does need a change, it seems to be guesstimating missile position half the time, even while the aircraft isn’t manoeuvring so the MAW should be able to detect the missiles exact position, might just be another case of AESA being modelled as a rapid scan mechanical radar
I dont think its even modeled like that.
It’s modelled as entity tracking lol. It’s perfectly accurate without any error, MAW modelling just sucks bottom line.
The UI doesn’t help; it only shows missiles as coming straight toward you as it was designed for MAWs that couldn’t tell direction and position, only angle. Half the time a missile will just be passing by you; but the UI makes it seem like it’s coming straight for you
Wait did I see that right? Can’t be. Shows a typhoon with no afterburner flying at Mach 1.31🧐 must be more marketing lies
It’s very very similar to how RWR works, we just have rangefinder=“true” and something about the closure rate being “200”(m/s?) whereas most MAW don’t.
Again, like in the video, that altitude indicator is present again.
This is from the typhoon simulator
This goes for both RWR and MAWS though. Its the inadequacy of the entire interface
Third person thermals
Yeah, that would be really cool. But was focusing on things that the game could actually handle. I doubt it would handle that just yet