Eurofighter Typhoon (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion (Part 2)

  • AI Mk. 24 Foxhunter Stage 2G (Tornado F. Mk. 3, Tornado F. Mk. 3 [ITA]), AI Mk. 24 Foxhunter Stage 3G (Tornado F. Mk. 3 (AOP)):
    • narrow search: period: 0.375 → 0.75 sec
    • medium search: period: 3 → 6 sec
    • wide search: period: 4.5 → 9 sec
    • narrow TWS: period: 0.75 → 1.5 sec
    • medium TWS: period: 1.5 → 3 sec

Nerfed Tornado too

They tweaked near every Radar in game and actively ignored anything to do with the Blue Vixen/CAPTOR-M we are beyond cooked

3 Likes

Yeah, we knew that would happen eventually, surprised it took this long.

Just have to hope for BOL to be fixed

What are the chances of that though, have they accepted the reports?

A year+ ago

Godspeed

Make sure to support this thread

I have and already other nations are against the idea…

Of course they are even ground mains are against it because it would make aircraft stronger in air modes

it was fixed so it has the same gimbal limits as on other planes

its had it’s gimble limit doubled 30-60.
It should have been removed in the Kh-38MT mode and then you could justify the gimble buff as you need to use a laser to guide it now.

2 Likes

it isnt a buff, the gimbal was ±60° on every other plane besides the Su-30
it is a fix not a buff

2 Likes

It’s a fix that the most OP ground attack missile in game didn’t need. Was Kh-38 failing to score kills with it’s limited gimble?

You know what would have been a “fun” fix replacing Brimstone 1 for Brimstone 2 (Wouldn’t be a buff because the in game Typhoon never used Brimstone 1…it would have been a fix

I understand what you are saying.

1 Like

that is a completly different weapon and the weapon itself didnt get buffed bc it had the same exact gimbal limits on the Su-25SM3 and Su-34

it is funny how you are trying to twist my statment by making up an completly unequivalent example

2 Likes

No it would be a fix

Brimstone 1 is inaccurate it’s incorrect it was never used. Don’t change the name and buff the stats and that would be a fix?

I’m happy for the constant buffs everyone else gets to enjoy. I see our pretend Kh-38 also has GNSS now as well so it’s even more accurate smoking and moving probably wont even deter it now

they didnt add a completly new weapon they, changed it so it like on the other platforms

but keep the mental gymnastics up

1 Like

Just usual double standards.

the gimbal limits is not a double standart
it is like saying the AGM-65 on the F-15E should have lower gimbal limits than on the F-16C because it is a better CAS plane

and the gnss is a result of the recently found brochure, which was only found bc of the Kh-38 thread so if you want to complain about that complain to that threads OP

2 Likes

Ron it’s fine, you are correct it should have been fixed.

GNSS found in a brochure, did that brochure have any details on the IR seeker of the KH-38MT…Of course it didn’t and instead of removing it they buff the missile.

This is my issue. It seems everyone else can submit a bug report and Gaijin jump on it action it right away…Other nations well their reports just sit for years.

Do not bring up the T-10 fm manual again please i’m well aware of that debacle

2 Likes

it did have details on the IR seeker
image

damn a 2 year old bug report on a russian plane that wasnt acted on

i dont need to, there are enough examples for bug reports that are a few years old, for every nation

3 Likes

Velocity vector is a little less pressing, more of a luxury when you compare some changes that actually impact how the aircraft flies.

That is also the smallest snip it you could have taken, do you have the brochure?