Eurofighter Typhoon - Germany's Best Fighter Jet

Yeah figured thats what they were gonna answer :/

Sad i would love to see it pull such AOA, other wise there have to be something that allows it to do this

Spoiler





even ignoring the fins, a meteror isnt cylindrical

It’s still a cylindrical object. It might have parts sticking out and it also doesn’t seem to be evenly distributed in weight around it’s body… BUT

In general it still rotates around an axis where only very small areas will actually be resisting the roll. It’s only the air intakes in this case that will resist the roll, since the fins will pretty much induce the roll and have limited (although not completely negligible) resistance towards the roll axis.

And given the surface area of the air intakes I don’t think that rolling this missile will consume a crazy amount of energy. Some yes, it still abides the laws of physics but since it will still be powered even in the terminal phase, it will be able to regain that lost energy instead of simply losing momentum.

I could have a whole compilation of r73 shots, but not any for the Aim9m its just a garbage missile. And every other missile are getting buffed, while aim9m has accepted bug reports that has been abandoned. Need IRIS-T at this point, the russians already have it

Probably only at low air speeds. The ramjet will probably be inefficient but it’ll still provide thrust.

i think he is talking about the fact that it is harder to turn when you have high amounts of thrust

the same reason why the IRIS-T can modulate its thrust

The IRIS-T can’t “modulate” its thrust. It has a four stage solid fuel booster where every stage (with a different thrust profile) burns for a fixed duration → fixed schedule, no modulation.
The Meteor on the other hand can freely regulate its thrust (except for the first booster stage) as the ramjet can vary its fuel supply as the situation desires.

2 Likes

It regulates its thrust so that the missile can provide thrust continually and deplete all the propellant by the time it hits the target? (Meteor)

Or is it dependent on something else?

Mig29G when it came out I was hitting the most disgusting shots with the R73, absolutely insane missile

1 Like

That’s fully up to the missile controls. For example: If the missile calculates that it won’t run out of fuel no matter the thrust, it will immediately go to full thrust to reach the target as fast as possible. Or, if the outer target is at the border of the engagement range, it will cruise at minimal thrust to enhance its range to the maximum. The moment it calculates that it has reserves (because the target approached the missile) it will accelerate again. So really, it is totally dependent on the situation how the missile will regulate its thrust. I would even guess, that it will reduce its thrust to make sharp turns.
Theoretically it could even go onto a ballistic path (like the AIM-120), shutdown its engine with a following glide phase and reignite it when the situation allows or calls for it. This is possible as its fuel (Borane) self-ignites the moment it gets into contact with oxygen.

3 Likes

I have more fun in the Mig-29G in air RB than the Eurofighter, because of the missile kit.

R73 is better than before too, since it has become less wobbly and has the fov reduction before launch

1 Like

Yeah that’s cracked! if Russia want un flarable missiles its time to give Typhoon Spectral flares

1 Like

And the manueverability should also be really good too? Similar to ASRAAM where there are only aft control fins?

There is not really anything known about the manueverability of the Meteor. It has no thrust-vectoring AFAIK and only its tail fins for control, but these are designed as stabilators so they can use their complete surface for the steering of the missile. Additionally the Meteor was more designed for range than manueverability.
How the missile behaves exactly, especially at speeds Mach >4, I don’t know.

1 Like

Who tf is this bug reporting manager?

The missile doesn’t use its fins to turn in the traditional sense.

The missile is statically unstable and the fins are there to induce angle of attack, the misisle then uses body lift and its motor to generate the turning force.

This is the exact same kind of ignorant nonsense used for the Stinger misisle G loads…

Bug report went out too soon tbh, now it will be even harder to get them to change their minds.

3 Likes

Need this document or that document to fix Brimstone and sht but straight up added fake missile like KH-38MT
Double standard clown

4 Likes

That is a developer answer that tech mod added in the comment.
If you have any documents that could halp with this one, that are free to use ofc, I would be grateful for sharing them.

1 Like

The only thing fictional about that missile is the seeker and the rest is identical to the kh38ml

So the missile itself isn’t fake but the seeker

They are correct though in that there is not a single source which says the Brimstone pulls 40° of AoA, only that it can attack targets up to 40° of boresight - which it can already do in game.

2 Likes