False.
Those planes really are in need of them as otherwise they’d be DoA bricks not even worth taking out, especially SM3.
It’s a question of convenience, while I disagree with the whole paragraph about brims, I can partially see the point. Eurofighter in grb is a piano. Without any anti-air present Eurofighter is the worst nightmare kind of CAS. With a couple pantsirs/strelas though… Still problematic but not as much as other jets are. Entire gameplay of eurofighter is a set of mindgames against SPAA that you’re supposed to play while defending against enemy CAS + being constantly aware that there’s no helicopters nearby.
A-10 doesn’t bother you? Why does A-10 is supposed to suck, while some soviet trashcan with wings is supposed to get treated like a toddler? I know the answer, but do you?
False.
I think you both have no point. I mean just read what you wrote.
KH’s need a range nerf. Or at least make KH capable jets spawning farther out.
I shot this Su-34 down as soon as I could, but it was already too late for 3 of my team mates. Its too easy to score kills with these. They spawn almost in range and launch just couple of seconds later. This is not healthy. Something nerfy should happen to Suchois in GRB. Asap.
Also. This is an air to air only Eurofighter. With full Amraams, 4 Aim-9M and air ammunition belt. Its a joke. Almost 1000 spawn points. Wounder why the ammo belt costs 130 spawn points alone (seriously why?). Even when you use the default belt, its too expensive to spawn. Suchois with KH’s spawn much earlier in a typical match. There is no defence against those. From the ground you can’t stop them decimating your team and air options are not viable.
Gameplay for Suchoi players in GRB should be a bit more complicated than just spawning, shooting few secs later, waiting for the killfeed. Thats the pinnacle of unfair gameplay. Would make alot sense of Suchois with KH#s cost 900+ spawn points and not the counter.
1 Like
Why do you even using air belts and causing additional spawn points when Stock Belt is pretty much the best one for both A2A and A2G missions.
Again this is entirely your fault.
5 Likes
I guess you’re referring to A-10C which sits two BR steps below SM3, while having more guided munitions and much better A2A kit.
SM3 without IR KHs would need to be at a lower BR than A-10C to not be pretty bad.
Nah, they would be the same br, don’t forget about how slow A-10 is
A2A kit is still too expensive imho.
1 Like
I havent checked to solid A2A kit since im using multirole kit all the time.
It’s like 22sp cheaper than multirole one, lol
Lmao that’s pure bs.
It is slow but at least it has some chances of defending itself.
Actually it has none, it’s a punching bag and a whole random knows about it
4x 9Ms are infinitely better than 2x R-73 on such airframes at 12.0/7 in GRB.
You can also just, you know, shoot the missiles out of the air? Sure Kh38s are a bit more tricky, but hammers or mavericks are beyond easy to shoot down.
I love how the SU-34 is considered a “brick” and requires insanely powerful FnF AGMs to be considered “usable” but the Tornados which are far far worse, dont get anything even close to the KH-38 in terms of performance. Especially the Gr4. Its rather hypocritical.
1 Like
And he gonna see Brits don’t need it because of Typhoon bla bla bla (in typical soviet victim style)
trust me he said that before
2 Likes
Just the case of good old compression. Putting planes that have 14.0 max BR in Air into a 12.7 max BR for Ground was always bound to produce massive compression issues.
SM3 sharing the same BR as Su-34 makes no sense as latter is just that superior.
At least Gr4 has enough “luck” to be at a lower BR.
1 Like
What are you talking about? I’ve been pulling 20Gs in my tornado alright.
Spoiler
After being exploded into shreds by a single button clicker on a pantsir
Gr4 has been superseded by the EFT.
SM3 has been superseded by the Su-34.
You should compare the two pairs between each other, so EFT vs Su-34 and Gr4 vs SM3.
1 Like