It should be relatively easy to fix the J-10, Eurofighter, Gripen, etc as these flow models are abundant and can be cross referenced from multiple different places finding similar results for Eurofighter;
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/0/0/38038/38510
its not good.
No wonder they want their aircraft to handhold them through each and every engagement.
I just dont understand this whole complain.
Sure Gaijin can add Brimstone 2 which has better motor in order to boost its capabilities but demanding F&F for best platform is just too much.
They either need to give the Typhoon 6x FnF Brimstone 1s or 18x (SAL) Brimstone 2s.
The fact we have an ahistorical weapon, in an ahistorically weakened state with outstanding bug reports, is just annoying if anything else. Especially when, despite all the denial, Su-34s are still reigning supreme as the most potent CAS at top tier, especially given the Pantsir stands the only chance of putting up any fight.
And yet KH-38s could easily be nerfed for the sake of “balance” like removing their IOG. But nope, full strength still with not a single nerf, and its been that way since the SU-25SM3 was added 9 months ago. 0 counter play possible… a bit like what they said regarding the SAL only limitations on the Brimstone, interesting…
But when the conversation moves from Ground modes to air modes like Sim. Brimstones without FnF are just never equipped, there is literally no value or reason to even bother trying to use them and that is the greatest shame. They would have made a really fun anti-convoy weapon in Sim, instead they are never equipped.
B2s with SAL would be a good middle point.
Having 18 of them would mean you’re much likely to overwhelm enemy AA as well.
That’s not comparable. Losing an integral system (which is built into the vehicle) is not the same as losing a weapon system that is optional.
Su-34 is susceptible to air threats which will shut it down completely.
Literally everything is susceptible to air threats, stop acting like Su-34 is the only one that has to contend with CAP counters, bah, it actually has one of the best radars in the game so you can spot an EFT faster than he can spot you.
At this point Su-34 would be nothing else but an air version of Ariete, with slightly better firepower (against one type of enemies) while being worse at everything else.
Blah blah. Still doesn’t explain why Su-34 hasn’t been neutered despite everyone having either Mavericks or AASM Hammers on top of better FMs (Rafale’s in the game, it can literally break your ankles, how come Su-34 is still going strong?), still don’t see how or why an EFT with six IR Brims would change that, yap yap.
You must teach me. Rafale claps me most times
They do not.
The fastest jet is the Typhoon. The best accelerating jet is the Typhoon. The best turning plane is the Typhoon. I don’t understand how you are figuring that the flight model efficiency is the same.
Isnt the F15E/I still faster in a straight line? That alone wouldnt accomplish much. I’m just trying to get my facts straight
and?
So just because the Typhoon is the better platform means it must be nerfed into the ground?
Su-34 was and sitll is MASSIVELY stronger than any other CAS aircraft except the F-15E when it was added (and still easily the second, maybe even joint first strongest “strike aircraft” in game) . Still was added with 6x KH-38s. In comparison to the Tornados, the Su-34 has a UFO FM.
I don t understand why Britian, Germany and Italy are banned from having good aircraft and the defacto is that US and USSR must always be the best
KHs aren’t optional on Su-34 as that is what defines the aircraft. Su-34 without those would be just sad. Same goes for FV without stabilizer.
Vehicles are allowed to have something their contemporaries lack as that is a part of the pro/con system. FV is actually a perfect example of that.
Top tier MBT can die to a 9.0 vehicle, but is much more susceptible to dying if it’s being engaged by another top tier MBT.
As such, Su-34’s A2A capabilities and defenses are lacking when compared to EFT, Rafale and US planes.
mmW Brimstone 1s are the same for the Tornado Gr4:
well then lets just remove the kh38MT and you can use the laser guided one
Or just remove the IOG. That would work just as well. If they exploded like AGM-65s do when you pop smoke, they wouldnt be anywhere near as OP as they are now
mmW is removed from the Brimstone for balance reasons, just remove IOG from the KH-38s for the same reasons
or like i said force them to fire one at the time
and if they want fnf they can use the kh29td
Wouldn’t be balanced, so no.
why wouldnt that be balenced?
isnt it fine to remove the fnf on the brimstone?
and the f15e also dosent have as many / advanced fnf ordinance in game rn
Su-34 has only 6x Laser + IOG missiles, which is 3x less than EFT while sharing the same guidance method.
Su-34 is also worse in FM and A2A weaponry departments.
At that point it’s only advantage would be missile’s speed, so how would that be balanced ?
you still have missile payload
you oneshot pretty much everything
game balance is alot more nuanced as you make it ot to be,
it isnt a simple pro and cons list