It can carry more of both ARHs and IRCCMs as well.
It’s FM is also better.
So can the fullback lol, R73s are IRCCMs and R77s are ARHs lol
And the FM being better or worse, ill leave to gaijin to decide, given that the flight models ingame are already unrealistic as shit
I find it very unfair you believe an aircraft should be fighting at the same BR as another aircraft made years later to beat the original
?
4 ARHs + 4 9Ms is more than 2 ARHs + 2 R-73s
Gen 4 vs Gen 4.5 should I be surprised? beside EFT was design to do just that and EFT already sit at higher BR but sure GRB br max at 12.7 which is the downside of the game and should be increase (I even want EFT to go up like 13.0 or 13.3 in GRB i might finally free of Clickbait)
And I proposed all F&F IR weapons to be removed and have us return to using just LGBUs and laser guided missiles, you decided that nah, the Russians should be given a full pass and Kh-38s should be left in the game:
Grow up and leave your double standards behind.
edit: the first screenshot is honestly so ironic when you think about it; Su-34 needs to be able to dunk on GRB to make up for its A2A cons… lmao??? How ignorant can one person be.
You demanding your toy to be the best at everything is far from sensible and in-line.
Lol what. Six of the slowest and weakest IR AGMs would make the EFT the “best” at everything? You haven’t actually touched Brimstones even once I see. Su-34 with its Kh-38s would still be the best CAS in the game.
You started behaving like a literal infant and when called out you started projecting.
I’ve only returned your feeling fueled moaning back to you, call it sharing. But gotta bring that line up over and over again because otherwise your can’t argue against my points as you know I am right, literal straw pulling ;)
Finally someone with a reasonable take.
Well this conversation has devolved into GRB nonsense (I don’t play GRB, I find it a torturously unfun experience)
But the brimstones are complete ass, all you have to do is try and use them to attack convoys in sim to see they’re pathetic compared to fire and forget weapons, anything with mavericks are better than the GR4 in that regard imo
I can probably kill a convoy with the F-111F, go back and re arm before I’ve got 6 brimstones off accurately
This is what drives me the most nuts. Aircraft being serverly limited in air modes, because of tanks in the ground mode.
Brimstones should have given Britain (and now italy and germany) the niche of being able to wipe out convoys
The point is not if they can do A2G but how well. Something you seem to ignore. I can do A2G support with FFARs or Zunis, but that doesnt mean its going to be as effective or efficient as using for example guided munitions.
Which if im not mistaken by only a 0.4 BR, yet capability wise they are vastly on a different level.
Additionally, dont assume that because i used tornado as an example (a plane that is categorized as a strike aircraft only one BR step below fullback) i am somehow saying youre right? How arrogant or ignorant are you.
a BR system that hardly works (obr 2018 BVM fighting 2A5s from 90s), is in desperate need of decompression and is based more on statistical performance instead of the actual performance of a vehicle? yea that BR system?
Actually a point i di agree with you on, making bigger ground maps would alleviate a bit of the problems posed by CAS as there would be more places for SPAA to move to and attack from.
And this is just dumb. Its part of the mode, if part of the mode is unusable then something is completely wrong, same way of something proves to be too powerful yet left in.
Focal point yes, but always with planes playing alongside of tanks in mind.
Is this your argument? The fact that you cant spawn a plane in ground without a tank? The way the mode functions is that you earn points from ground to be able to bring in planes, that doesnt detract from the fact its still combined arms. Its why SPAAs exist because why would you need anti air systems in a game mode where tanks are the “focal point”.
Have you ever tried queuing into ground battles with only anti air vehicle in your loadout? Weird how it lets you do that.
1 Like
Get to see all the rays bounce of the Eurofighter
Yeah I was really excited to get the GR4 for sim when it was announced due to brimstones…
The disappointment was immeasurable
The only use I’ve found for Brimstones is for the occasional funny kill in Air RB
That’s like proposing to remove stabilization from all 7.3s which will leave FV without one of it’s only selling points. Removing selling points of vehicles will make them much worse, but you can’t grasp that concept.
Telling me to have a terrible day and spamming anime tells me you’re the one who needs to grow up.
For you information Su-34 isn’t the only aircraft that can be spawned in a GRB game, so it’s lack of defenses against others shouldn’t be taken lightly.
Surely much better vehicle overall than the infamous Su-34.
Your arguments have been shut down hours ago, now I’m mostly replying to your rage posting as it’s honestly amusing to see someone malding this much over his aircraft not being handheld in every area.
1 Like
Yeah, i’ve not used them once in sim yet. real shame. The core weapon system for the Tornado Gr4, might as well be deleted from hte game where ASB is concerned
Yes, you found out BR compression is a thing.
Date of introduction has nothing to do with vehicle’s capabilities.
You’re actively trying to make things even worse, instead of making them better.
Having unusable stuff is not good, but if I had to pick I’d always pick that focal points have the upper hand.
Air units don’t even need to spawn during a game.
True combined arms mode would be that every single match. Current GRB isn’t.
Yes as it’s a possibility air units will spawn, but that happening is not a given though.
This is comparing apples to oranges. F&F Brimstone is a selling point of the Eurofighter, F&F Maverick is a selling point of the F-16C, and F&F Hammers are the selling point of the Rafale - but you’re fine with them not having them/removing it from them in order to make up for “Su-34s disadvantages”, how hypocritical… but you can’t grasp “concept” or so they say.
Telling me to have a terrible day and spamming anime tells me you’re the one who needs to grow up.
Must’ve ruffled your feathers seeing as you once again are bringing this up lol, also tells a lot about your mental age, good.
For you information Su-34 isn’t the only aircraft that can be spawned in a GRB game, so it’s lack of defenses against others shouldn’t be taken lightly.
So now we’re ignoring how tanks are supposed to be the focal point of the game-mode because it no longer suits you and the narrative you’ve created? Su-34 not being as good at CAP duties as the Eurofighter, Rafale or the F-16C is not an argument for it to be able to be the only aircraft with ripple firing F&F missiles while others cannot, at the same time, others having this capability doesn’t diminish Su-34s ability to affect what’s happening on the ground, this is a slippery slope you’ve created and doubled down on.
Furthermore, multi-role fighters shouldn’t just be limited because a strike aircraft would otherwise no longer be (which wouldn’t even be true) “the best”. This is something only you, who wants Russia to be the best in terms of CAS, subscribe to, and this is due to your bias for Russia, and bias against other nations, yet you aren’t willing to accept your own (confirmation on top) bias.
Surely much better vehicle overall than the infamous Su-34.
Following this logic, the T-80BVM and T-90M should both lose 3BM-60 as they are better vehicles than Challenger 2s and the Arietes, surely you’d accept this bargain, surely you wanna practice what you preach and stop presenting yourself as nothing more but a hypocritcal ignoramus, right?
Your arguments have been shut down hours ago
How delusional one has to be to think this lol. I can actually accept when someone makes my argument invalid with solid logic (something you can’t do), you haven’t, and likely never will as your whole concept of balance relies on making just one nation stand out, and for the rest to rot.
Statement of a century.
Dont need is not the same as cant.
The entire existence of SPAAs is tied to the existence of planes in ground RB. How are you not understanding this.
1 Like
also dont particularly understand why you have the idea that people here are malding instead of just replying to things you wrote. Ive not seen anyone throw slurs, directed swears or raging and REEEEEEEing in here.
Particularly this says more about you than others if you just constantly assume that anyone who disagrees with you is malding and raging at their screen like the german kid from the meme.
People here have different opinion than yours, they arent necessarily malding. If anything atmost they are being frustrated by lackluster understanding from the other side.
1 Like
Mirage 2000D RMV - 2021
When is the last time someone complained about that