I see from your top topics and how you constantly talk about mikelangelo
Apperntly not bc you are still going on about it, even after I made it clear multiple times.
Sawing couple threads and claiming im frenchie is the most funny thing i’ve heard.
I fight for multiple nation’s vehicles to recieve their historical performance, if you cant see this then its your problem.
How about you supply an official document which clearly states that these technical identical pylons can fit all sort of smart ordnance, but is forbidden for A2A?
Nope only I need to proof my point, bc I don’t share his opinion
Sad there is no leaked Typhoon flight manual exists.
1 Like
IT would be logical to assume that there no reason why Harms, Alams etc can be fitted, but no Amraam. What kind of reason could prevent that?
I cant take your words seriously when you claimed that Germany should be only one to recieve Eurofighter Typhoon.
Everyone knows how biased you are when it comes to Germany and your infinite complains.
As for the documents if you dont have official documents to support your claims current EFT will remain same.
Software and wiring
It was… They were refused because you cant proof it cant carry it as it even never carried it. They wont list all weapons it cant carry.
Iam pretty sure the wiring is in place bc the pylons are standardized and are able to mount the launch rail for the amraam
Look at F/A-18. It can carry LAU-127 which is universal for AIM-9 and AIM-120 on inboard pylon, but cannot load AIM-9 there.
so in that case any plane could hold almost any armament, because it doesnt say it cant
Idk about the hornet,
But why would they build a mock up with missiles there or make renders with amraams there if it isn’t possible
Potential modernization.
1 Like
Anybody got the report link for the Eurofighter pylon? It has good information on it
Potential modernization?
This render is from before the EF entered service
Proposed but refused loadout
1 Like
That doesn’t proof that it isn’t possible tho
"Okay mr Technical director of the Eurofighter program, every participating country rejected the proposed loadout of carrying air to air weaponry on the inner wing pylons.
But shall we add complexity, weight, and cost to the jet anyway in case they decide to model the jet in a video game later?"
I’m mostly joking. But the loadout being rejected by all participants strongly suggests that the loadout is also actually impossible due to cost and complexity