yes
2 Likes
We have it with the CR2 armour…British tank armour hasnt improved since the 1980s.
A real common sense approach is needed and if Gaijin are holding it back for balance. Then just say that!
We know Russia and the US will receieve an AESA/PESA Radar in the next few updates
Typhoon will be outclassed by these systems and for no good reason. Of course we cant find scan pattern and speeds on in service aircraft without breaking Gaijins document controls
1 Like
Just like the Leopard…
From the Leopard 2 TVM till Leopard 2A7V nothing was improved (in the armor area)
1 Like
Just like the armor of the German Leopard 2
You cant even get scan speeds from manual due to how that radar system works… Its essentially pesa in mechanical body with its functions and processing.
It should be closer to Su-34 and Rafale radars than any other m-scan ingame.
Oh yeah Germany, Britain and Italy spend a shit ton of money to develop a new radar that isn’t any better than the blue vixen.
So riddle me this:
Why didn’t they use the blue vixen then?
2 Likes
Ask gaijin, apparently they know.
1 Like
Do you want to tell the RAF or shall I?
=)
These two situations do not compare. The Yak-141 simply has wepaonary and systems that were either tested or proposed. All known performance information for its radar have been applied. All of its flight performance and characteristics are real from the flying prototype. So it’s not clear exactly what the comparison is here.
For CAPTOR, it’s treated to the same standards as all other radars in game. It has been modled based on all available public information and data.
Radars in game are all created and changed via the same means. Not speculative improvements with no quantifiable metrics by which to change them with.
1 Like
Godspeed to you!
1 Like
then why does the TWS not track targets, it finds someone and then doesnt follow them
Shouldn’t it be x-band then I saw multiple public sources that say the Captor-m is a x-band radar
Pretty sure X-Band is I-Band
1 Like
I have answered you twice previously on this. If there are further unreported issues that have not been forwarded, then they should be reported properly so they can be investigated.
Asking the same question 3 times is sadly not going to yield a different result.
All reported issues are being investigated.
You guys are gong to have fun when you try to add things like the F-22…Public data avilable is pretty sparse.
At that point will Gaijin accept they need to take a common sense approach?
Based on data - revisiting tracked targets outside of scanned bar means, it has to scan quick AF otherwise it PHYSICALLY CANT KEEP CONSTANT REFRESH RATE NEEDED FOR TWS… Guy programming this needs literally one braincell to realize it.
And flares on 141?? It was literally guess where they would have been. There was never indication of their placement. Its pure fantasy.
I kinda want to see source of scan rate of Su-34 radar.
Given the current state of CAPTOR and CAPTOR + PIRATE. should we make a dedicated CAPTOR thread?
Also can anyone make a comparison to the improved scanspeed on the UK and Italian TWS compared to Germany?