https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Gp2KI0MQpeh4
So if we attach 2 sources aka. 2 Loadout graphics it’s gonna get accepted and we get more AMRAAMs?
1 Like
Looks like that might be true
As far as I have seen graphics alone arent enough for them. You need some irl pictures
I’m not sure if I should take it personal that this report got resolved within 15 minutes but my report about the stock loadout has been open for 2 days
9 Likes
And this is an actually important one. I hated to stock grind the F15Cs with only 4 missile because of this stupid stock loadout arrangement. Please not again…
4 Likes
It was removed I thought
1 Like
I remember it had it for a few updates cant remember when/if it was removed
I wonder if the 4 second track time was because they intended to give it a much higher acan speed, but havent done so yet so it “drops locks” because it cant always get back to the target in time?
I dont think track time being hogher is necessarily better, as it can lead to “ghosts” on the radar, commonly seen on the Su-27’s radar which iirc has a 12 sec track time.
Shorter is likely bwtter if you have the scan speed to support it.
Yeah, We’ll have to see, Gunjob has stated the devs have changes planned for the Radar and so not worth submitting bug reports at this time.
But in the SHar you can maintain track on a target comfortably right at the edge of the radar, but doing the same in the Typhoon just resets the lock. Very annoying, especially in a shoot down situation.
The only thing I can think of is the INS tracking time being too low, but yes, if the scan rate is increased, then 4 seconds would be fine
1 Like
Any active reports on BOL pods being buffed?
gunjob etc are the guys with that ingo, gotta ask them to redo a report for the euro
1 Like
EF2000 dont have pod for flare and chaff
How does it carry 400 flares and chaff then it must have BOL pods?
buddy, the problem is that gajin until now was to lazy to model the bol pods
U did a report for the general effectiveness of the BOL, do you might want to redo your report in regards to the euros? this might the devs to actualy give it a quicker look
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ba4AJaRzkatr
And here @Flame2512 one which could be redone
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/B8OvCzjZ7E91
1 Like
It’s worse than the Gripens radar isn’t it? But PS/05-A is based on Blue Vixen and older, smaller, less powerful etc.
I believe the BOL for the EF2000 is built in with its MAWs.
From what I understand, at the moment, The Gripen litereally have C&P Blue Vixen. IRL it was basically the same but given some upgrades like A2G modes
but at the moment, Id say CAPTOR-M is worse than Blue Vixen