50% would be a huge benefit. 333° as you write would probably be only maximum movement when its tracking something at REALLY close range whilst the EF and that target are both going extremely fast in violent maneuvres.
I agree normal scanrate would probably not approach that speed.
It’d be quite a simple suggestion for Gaijin.
The CAPTOR-M should be better than both the ICE radar and blue Vixen, but not as good as the Aesa on Rafale. Whatver that means to them would be hard for us to counter
ok which one one of you goofballs just posted on the DCS forum asking for this info
There is a Rafale thread, best to use that
Yeah, must be the high resolution part that i’ve seen referenced.
Perhaps we can use that to prove the radar is more capable than it is currently.
Also, secondary source but:
Accurate tracking of both stationary and moving objects on the ground is enabled by the Ground Moving Target Indication/Track function. - source
so the GMTI is defnetly underperforming too
These pictures show C101 testbed. Six MICA is correct, eight are F.4.1 feature.
though with SAR its kinda well hard to prove something because you can often achieve high resolution with just increasing the scan time.
eurofighter can reach good resolutions but we dont know at what speed
They are not historical…
Brimstones have 3 modes of operation. We have mode 1 in game, Mode 2 is a LOBL mode with FnF and mode 3 is a true FnF LOAL mode. Mode 3 would be totally game breaking at the moment, but mode 2 probably not, but gaijin refuses to add it on balancing concern reasons. Despite weapon systems like KH-38s being just as capable, if not more so
Genuine question: Whats the highest amount of KH 38s on one plane in game? I assume it’d be in the neigborhood of 6 or 8 on the SU34 perhaps?
6 on the Su-34
Hmm. I am glad Im not the one making balancing decisions for Brimstones thats for sure.
Potentially 18 KH38 equivalents on 1 jet is quite scary
Perhaps, they do also have shorter range and a much smaller warhead. At least the 1s.
But its annoying from a PvE perspective in sim, to have such neutered weapons. Almost no point running them on something like the GR4 due to the fact you can only engage 1 target at a time.
And they are slower too I think?
I totally see the problem for PvE in sim too.
As I said Im glad I am not the one who has to make these decisions. Also, this proves to me that intelligent debate on brimstones CAN be had, without it devolving immediately
Hehe yeah, and yeah… The only balancing factor is quantity. with a like for like IIR seeker from the AGM-65, they would be one of the weaker AGMs at top tier
So mode 3 is just that u fire them all and they all search for a target themselves?
Can someone explain the new changes from yesterday to today please?
yep, only pre-programmed targets, but you could essentially jsut ripple fire them over a battlefield and they would go find targets. Coordinating with each other to each hit a seperate target. Was designed for just wiping out soviet convoys
Looks a little like this
Ok that is truly gamebreaking rn. But then i dont see any reason not to add mode 2
