Based on data - revisiting tracked targets outside of scanned bar means, it has to scan quick AF otherwise it PHYSICALLY CANT KEEP CONSTANT REFRESH RATE NEEDED FOR TWS… Guy programming this needs literally one braincell to realize it.
And flares on 141?? It was literally guess where they would have been. There was never indication of their placement. Its pure fantasy.
I kinda want to see source of scan rate of Su-34 radar.
Given the current state of CAPTOR and CAPTOR + PIRATE. should we make a dedicated CAPTOR thread?
Also can anyone make a comparison to the improved scanspeed on the UK and Italian TWS compared to Germany?
cough 30year old swedish armor trials cough
5 Likes
Its not scanspeed. It should keep tws track stored for 8 seconds instead of 4.
Is it just me or do the Fueltanks on the Screen are look more like the 1500L ones which the EF can also carry?
Its also scanspeed though right? This thing scans as slow as any old 60’s radar set
I’ve lost any confidence in Gaijin’s impartiality by this point.
One rule for thee but not for me…
The Captor-m should also have atleast 90° of gimbal
1 Like
The MFDs were designed with the available information there is on icons. If you have info to show there should be a different tank icon for the current drop tanks, please submit a report and we can take a look.
1 Like
I can make a report using Su-25SM3 documentation that shows all of its armament and lack of Kh-38 but in the end it will be just denied by the fact that “if something is not shown in document doesn’t mean it can’t be used or wasn’t added to armament later”. That already was discussed with staf. And gaijin has access to this document.
That would be correct. A document showing something isn’t there doesn’t mean it’s not technically comparable or was tested outside of manual / offical armaments lists. We have plenty of examples of this in game for all nations.
Off topic but Gaijin have smashed it with the unlockable skins for the German and UK typhoons yet to see the Italian ones! Good job Gaijin
Reminds me of the 2 extra amraam missles that were constantly denied. But thise somehow cant be true.
But eh whatever
2 Likes
Captor M have ±70 gimbal
So what is point in trying to report fictional weapons? You will just easily deny the report and can show zero sources because as DEV you don’t have to. Removing of straight made up things is almost impossible in this game.
Sadly they were not proven to be realised.
Not having document showing increased scan speed while everywhere being mentioned to be very quick doesnt mean its same as decade older set.
Do you even see what you are writing. Hypocrisy at its greatest.
So the Countermeasure on the Yak141 or the missiles
You know, marketing lies
3 Likes