These two situations do not compare. The Yak-141 simply has wepaonary and systems that were either tested or proposed. All known performance information for its radar have been applied. All of its flight performance and characteristics are real from the flying prototype. So it’s not clear exactly what the comparison is here.
For CAPTOR, it’s treated to the same standards as all other radars in game. It has been modled based on all available public information and data.
Radars in game are all created and changed via the same means. Not speculative improvements with no quantifiable metrics by which to change them with.
I have answered you twice previously on this. If there are further unreported issues that have not been forwarded, then they should be reported properly so they can be investigated.
Asking the same question 3 times is sadly not going to yield a different result.
Based on data - revisiting tracked targets outside of scanned bar means, it has to scan quick AF otherwise it PHYSICALLY CANT KEEP CONSTANT REFRESH RATE NEEDED FOR TWS… Guy programming this needs literally one braincell to realize it.
And flares on 141?? It was literally guess where they would have been. There was never indication of their placement. Its pure fantasy.
The MFDs were designed with the available information there is on icons. If you have info to show there should be a different tank icon for the current drop tanks, please submit a report and we can take a look.
I can make a report using Su-25SM3 documentation that shows all of its armament and lack of Kh-38 but in the end it will be just denied by the fact that “if something is not shown in document doesn’t mean it can’t be used or wasn’t added to armament later”. That already was discussed with staf. And gaijin has access to this document.
