yea the main reason I am intrested with enlisted is because of the cool historical reticles. if only wt had those. but I do agree I think wt is the better game
P2W and bot farm.
Enlisted hates Brits more than War Thunder.
Loss of tunisia and being a sub-tree of US was not funny at all.
The user experience and UI in Enlisted are so awful, i was one of the first to ever play this game and i put a lot of time and even some money into it but after years the Devs messed it up so bad getting things ready before starting a match feels like going through spread sheets. That alone made it unplayable for me, not to mention actual gameplay issues and terrible battle rating system on top of that.
I think war thunder could learn from enlisted game mode wise with the attack/defense style maps they can even incorporate the enduring confrontation spawn system that costs SL into this but they would need dedicated maps or redesigned maps for it it would be a lot of work for them
Oddly enough when i saw this post I was talking to a mate I play enlisted with and have just introduced to WT. he told me about a modern combat event a couple years ago in enlisted which was just like the modern event war thunder had before we ended up with modern missiles killing us from kilometres away.
With the Burma maps being added its logical for Korea to be added as the burmese campaign was just the prologue to what happened in Korea. After than pandoras box is opened
give it a year and we will see M14s AK47s and korea
If you go into the custom servers on enlisted you can still play the modern stuff I used to do it all the time on Xbox
Is the zombies mode still there?
I don’t know I haven’t been on there in a while
shame. as that should have become a permanent mode it rocked
very easy to push both of them apart
Enlisted is a very realistic battlefield
warthunder is an arcade game where almost none of the tanks are realistically accrete and the game/map designs where all made in the 2008 using unreal engine 3 graphics and beta pixels
y’know they use the same exact graphics engine right?
yeah but different teams per game the team for warthunder is just really bad
Tank on tank combat is better then ground simulator mode with using viewports commander an get killed if you turn your head out, using crewmembers per seat, having to go out of vehicle to repair and extinguish fire.
Personaly to me worst part about enlisted is removal of lone fighter from main matchmaking and putting it to custom games.
i mean i would agree but biggest issue with tanks and maps in general in enlisted is its constant cqc atleast wt has some big maps.
Depends on what part of realism we’re talking about. I like WT for having more detailed vehicle modelling but I like Enlisted for it’s inclusion of regular infantry forces and the fact battles were primarily fought by soldiers over vehicles
Enlisted also feels kinda “clunky” compared to other FPS games with realism elements. Not clunly on a “I can’t read my screen” level but on a higher sens doesn’t get rid of the feeling of horrific slowness. Definitely prefer it over BF5, but if Insurgency or Arma is on the table I’m taking one of those two
You can make them for top tier with custom gunsights. I have a semi-accurate leo 2 and t-series sights. Really wish for WW2 optics
yea but the sight system has little veriatey and the scope still doesn’t look like an optic, it looks like someone painted black on your screen. enlisted has built in historical sights with sharp and slightly distorted optics. also, forced use of gun sight.
enlisted is basically war thunder but everything is actually realistic. sure the bots suck, but honestly wt feels more like cod than enlisted, an actual first person shooter…