doesnt japan also have that F-15JSI thing that was announced not to long ago?
still havent made one yet, and it still isnt completely clear on some of the upgrades it will receive
1 Like
Yes. F-15JSI is in development.
1 Like
possibly
AmErIcA SuFfErS
1 Like
It’s more or less balanced, but it’s definitely nerfed in terms of realism, just like other nations.
Honestly, this is the first time in 4 years that I have had a calm and rational conversation on the War Thunder forum. Normally, people’s arguments tend to be loaded or fanatical or completely filled with total ignorance
Some nations are currently missing essential things in their tree or in their vehicles. Italy and others still need their SPAA, others need spall liners, others don’t have adequate support vehicles at high tiers. USA should be low priority, all things considered.
Yep, its no different to the Harrier GR1 being the same BR as the AV-8A, despite the fact the AV-8A is vastly superior.
im quite curious with how it will be since its based on the ligther C models and its reported to use tech from the EX, boeing gonna shove the EXs engines in there its gonna be a space shuttle in game
UK br tax
Yeah…
There are a lot of vehicles that would be really easy to add currently like the Avenger which is literally a humvee with 2 hellfire launchers and if it is the mk2 it also have a 50. Cal,or the m-shorad which is the striker chassis with a 30mm bushmaster and hellfires,also the addition of fire and forget hellfires for the ah64 would be easy to add in the game
Sometimes I wonder how many people or who are in charge of deciding the BR of the vehicles, but they certainly don’t do it especially well. I still remember the Fox at 7.0, the Puma at 8.3 and the XM800T at 7.7
C models cant fit the improved engines
Let’s not forget that the Stryker still did not receive any spall liners whatsoever.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Keep talking from alt
1 Like
russian bias does exist but damn thats really bad
like… just avg player.