i was justifying why people where happy to have it, most US players wanted domestic designs but 1 copy paste is better than 0 anything
“if you only look at the BRs where heavy tanks dont exist in the US tree, there arent any heavy tanks” (except the abrams which are heavies)
if you only look at the copy paste in other trees and ignore the unique design then the only tree in the game with unique vehichle is the us. but we dont do that, because its not useful to anyone and waste everyones time
its the tree that has heavies and the T95E1 is in that line per the wiki
So what your saying is that you dislike C&P tech but having one C&P tech is better than having non, how does that make sense ?
3 Likes
having C&P is better than having a 3.3 br gap,
i put the 3 line because its were the most of the Abrams are, in the second line they are M4, M26/46/47/48/60 all of them were mass produced (100k tanks) of course and all of them will be in other TTs
Then shush complaining about C&P because it is helping you
1 Like
The US, in the long run, has more than one C&P. The Skink is just one of the researchable ones, which became two vehicles with the pack.
Other inculde:
Stringray - it’s the Thai version, which the US never used (didn’t even test).
On the air side, there are multiple Japanese, German and even British props.
Bet there are even non-US designs in the boats (boats that other nations designed and used).
2 Likes
and having a unique design is better than C&P
its the line with all the US heavy tanks, so its the heavy tank line, and mass production doesnt disprove my point of it being more than 10,
no, i dont like the C&P in the US tree and want it to be replaced with a domestic design,
NASAMSfor example is a copy paste from Norway, USA doesn’t have mobile launchers, i didnt see anyone complain about that
2 Likes
only non us boat i can think of is vietnamese, and all the other US copy paste is un-neccesary and should be removed
more than 10 what?
The biggest issue with copy paste is the amount that exists instead of a domestic design, or without filling a gap
For example,: the skink replaces possible us designs
1 Like
Oh, they did. They complained Norway/Swedden got it despite it being their variant and the missile itself being designed with a Norwegian company.
Because no matter who made the variant or even the vehicle, it can’t be C&P in the US tree must be domestic to them, even if the US never used it or they did use it, but it’s domestic to someone else. (So many times I’ve seen US mains claim families they only used later models of, or have weak connections to, as pure domestic to them.
8 Likes
That’s because US mains tend to be rather dumb
Poland mentioned 💪💪💪
4 Likes
Weren’t the Polish Cromwells in Polish units in the Royal army? Can a future Polish TT get one?
1 Like
Probably can get them
2 Likes
I love your dedication.
2 Likes