British TT should either get India or Canada, not both. They cant have 4 different modern MBTs, they either gonna have the Challys and Abrams + T90M or Leopard 2A6 not both of them
Alright, alright, fine. Singaporean Leopard 2SG and 2A7 it is then.
2a7?
1 Like
Singapore don’t use 2a7s and have never even been close to using them
1 Like
Nah we should get everyone.
Cameroon - WMA301
Gabon - WMA-301
Kenya - T-72AV
Nigeria - VT-4 + T-72AV/M1 + ST-1
Sierra Leone - T-72
Uganda - T-90S + T-72BA/B1+ SU-30
Tanzania - VT-2
Bangladesh - MBT-2K + VT-5
India - Arjun.MK1 + MK.1A + T-72 Ajeya + Zorawar
Malaysia - PT-91M Pendekar
Pakistan - Haider + VT-4 + T-80UD+ Al-khalid
Singapore - Leo-2SG
Canada - Leo 2 + Mexas
Cyprus - T-80 + Whatever they end up buying next
Only stuff we’d be missing for now is South Korean, Israeli and Japanese
Because UK ruled this countries 50+ years ago doesn’t mean they should get them, with the same logic I have also a long list of Subtrees for Greece
4 Likes
Difference being that Greece doesn’t have an equivalent to the commonwealth of nations
so? its basically nothing only the countries the see the King as their own king have closer ties and its just Australia, NZ and Canada from the counties that can be added to WT
3 Likes
To be fair neither do Italy, Japan or France.
Subtrees aren’t really decided by the Commonwealth or similar even for the UK tree, but individual nations that are commonwealth are chosen as subtrees. For example other commonwealth nations are subtrees elsewhere already like Pakistan, Malaysia and soon Cyprus.
7 Likes
Nothing ever happens
2 Likes
They did have an empire though. I absolutely hope future subtrees won’t resort to just former members of empires.
1 Like
The point has been lost on you. I could say Martian Leopard 9XZ and it means the same thing.
You had no point considering the devs themselves even said Singapore currently won’t a official sub tree or anywhere AND THEY DONT USE. 2A7S
1 Like
ill more than happily trade india for canada.
please for the love of god take india i cant stand there being USSR slop
1 Like
the 15cm slg (yes omg 5mm less) has already been in the game for like 6 years at that point, the difference of pen is about .4mm if i remember correctly, survivability is the same, its a little slower, has no mg (big downside i agree) and the velocity is slower which can be good or bad depending on your ability to estimate ranges and lobbing shells over obstacles.
thats about all the difference so no gameplay gap was filled i doubt anyone wouldve even thought about bringing up that germany didnt get a m44 much less an outcry.
i also seriously doubt that they NEEDED 3 more years of development to slap a different gun on a nashorn chassis which they already had a modeled.
and again i wouldnt bring the german one up if they didnt specify that one in the original post since its the one that makes the least sense to bring up
1 Like
Wooosh.
I love saying stupid stuff and then acting like I had a point originally
Well, good news. India doesn’t have a T-90M, or well, the MS they were meant to receive but never did due to other reasons.
The UK for alt 12.X MBTs that weren’t more Challengers have always been between the Aussie M1A2 SEPv3 and the Leo 2A6M CAN.
I might see if I can make a more refined version of that at some point soon… With vehicles, nations the involved nations do currently have.
You can think that, I don’t need to justify myself to you. If you can’t see how ridiculous the copy-paste problem is because you’re focusing on incredibly minor details, then that’s on you.
Copy paste problem - a unique 2a4 modification that’s not even confirmed for Israel and currently would end up in Germany