Try this: Sign in required WebPoll
3 Likes
Stona, please…
If Hummel was already in development, why bother with copy pasting US vehicles before it was available?
Did Hummel really needed that much of development being a Nashorn with diffent gun?
If M44 and M55 were placeholders for Hummel, why not remove them now?
There is a writing on the wall why Gaijin is doing what it is doing. HUGE letters. No ammount of corporate pulp can cover it.
2 Likes
It Works, Thx!
It was already available. Hummel was only ready more than 1,5 year later.
Did Hummel really needed that much of development being a Nashorn with diffent gun?
As you can see, it was needed.
If M44 and M55 were placeholders for Hummel, why not remove them now?
Not sure from where you took the “placeholder” part? And the idea to remove it cannot be serious, right?
You do not like them - lets remove them from the game.
3 Likes
Russia never gets copy and paste vehicles for packs. Some nations get a bunch of them
Thanks for posting the feedback form as a separate thing.
Still left harsh criticism of A) The number of premiums per update B) Adding premiums without a tech tree equivalent and C) Lack of fair access to older content + WT.Live on console
If you think that is the same as “some nations”
the playerbase would riot if russia got some copy paste vehicles like captured leopards and abrams
Yes. it broke immersion, dilluted the tech trees and added more grind. So much win!
1 Like
russian leopards and abrams are not exactly copy and paste, because they are not in the TT. But what I mentioned above, there are only camouflage changes.
As a Thai player from small community, no matter how much we want VT-4 in a tech tree, our voices just can’t complete with the massive group opposing it (and we all know exactly who they are).
2 Likes
what?
Spoiler
also the BMPT and T-80UD are the same with the TT variants
Are you sure they are completely same? They are completely different versions.
Can you find t80ue1, t72av,su39 mig23ml on the TT?
yes T-80U, T72B, SU-25T, MIG-23MLD all are the same with = minor differences
Yeah, I think there was statistics somewhere here that showed just how many players of this game are (PRC) Chinese, so it’s not surprising. That said from what I’ve seen they still enjoy playing the tank. They might not be the target audience, they might not have been the ones to ask for it, but they are by no means a reason not to add it.
When War Thunders nations are set up of multiple nations, Gaijin has to consider that each have their respective fanbases and want to see their vehicles. There is players that want PRC vehicles, players that want ROC vehicles, players that want both and players that want neither. Some players even don’t care about nations, only isolated gameplay. There is many kinds of players, and ideally the game should be something that all of them can enjoy as much as possible.
1 Like
“Minor changes”? Have you played these vehicles?
I think Singaporean vehicles shouldn’t be split. No nation deserves that treatment. There is already a Singaporean vehicle in game, it wouldn’t be fair to Singaporean players if they couldn’t make lineups with it.
If they add Singapore, but split them, they are signaling that they value them less than other nations, which should never happen.
For the moment Greece has Leo 2A6HEL. There was a talk to update the Leo 2 A4 to 2A7HEL , but i don’t remember something happening with it.