Too modern.
2 Likes
That 100t prototype was just the weight without the outer armor layer, turrets and roof plate. Assuming all of that would’ve been fitted a complete version being 150t seems more realistic.
They wouldn’t add 2/3 of a tank, they’d add the tank as it would’ve been fully complete.
1 Like
From H. Doyle’s book, Panzer Tracts Nr.9 Jagdpanzer - Jagdpanzer 38 to Jagdtiger, Thomas L. Jentz, Hillary Louis Doyle, 1997, ISBN 0-9648793-3-6 (page 50)
4x 88mms were installed.
1 Like
Possibly still fits as how it was fitted and if it was actually functional Is unknown 🤷♀️
Doesn’t have to be entirely functional, Rad90s turret is entirely non functional for example.
As for how it looks… Well… We don’t exactly know how Ostwind II looks like lol
Radkafwagen 90 was functional. The turret ring well not so much
And I’m a firm believer in Ostwind 2 being removed
“Der Turm war jedoch nicht funktionsfähig. Selbst drehen ließ er sich nicht.”
Non functional turret.
It would seem unlikely that devs will remove Ostwind 2 considering they replaced Coelian with it lol.
Gaijin admitting they make a mistake? Hahaha
Girl… That literally says it wouldn’t turn as is the turret ring was non functional
what could even replace it that is actually 5.0-6.0 material?
1 Like
Nothing really 🤷♀️ unless they like finally move the Luchs to a reasonable br like 6.0 lmao
it gets like gen 1 thermals still though, plus at 6.0 the R3 doesnt even get scouting or APDS (it should get scouting)
What is irrelevant considering it’s the size of a house and the gun already can’t pen anything. It’s much more comparable to amx 10P or ZLZ 92 then r3
the r3 gun is worse (the aforementioned no APDS) and the zsl92 also doesnt get scouting
Your talking about 25mm so with basically identical one to its apds it’s not anything crazy lmao. And I quite literally said I wouldn’t compare it to r3… Reading comprehension
yes i was ignoring it because i disagree,
i just dont understand why you dont want to compare it to the R3? only difference is r3 is more mobile, otherwise same gun, basically same role, r3 is just worse, no scouting no apds
no the no APDS is talking about the R3 gun which is the same as the luch one
yes i agree the zsl92 gun is very comparable to the luch, but again the zsl92 doesnt get thermals or scouting so is worse than the luch
Nothing, which is why it should stay and the 341 should return. They’ve removed enough cool vehicles from the game already.
1 Like
On paper it looks like a better AMX-10P, not sure if it’s a full BR step better though.
We have these 20mm APDS carriers from 5.3 to 8.7 depending on their chassis, so Gaijin seems to have a lot of faith in that cannon. I think it also might be a part that there is more light targets at the higher BRs compared to the 5.3-6.7 range.
1 Like
yeah im not against the ostwind 2 staying, i am kind of also for the coelian staying but only because i support the expansion of what can be allowed to be added to the game and unless they do that the 341 shouldnt return
1 Like
idk if we should include the xm800t in this, the full stabiliser is a very obvious thing that kinda excludes it from comparison with the others imo
yeah with the apds it becomes very reliable at 7.3+, but even when youre lower than that its very good at getting assists with
Yeah this is a well known balancing problem. Some auto cannon vehicles become straight up deadlier if you raise them up too much in BR. It’s why I use the Kugel at 7.7 too. By that point it’s straining a little in terms of some of the planes you can see, but there are so many light targets you can nuke.