No gun means it’s doa
you can put a gun pod under it
C-5 is a downgrade lol
And the Finnish F-18C lacks C-5 and HMS, still 14.0
🤣
No, no it would not. You’ll have more missiles, MAW and BOL—the whole 9 yards, and similar if not better acceleration in a straight line, but you’re still gonna get bonked by MICA in any non-BVR scenario.
And this is all before Meteors are introduced 😵💫
this is the unfortunate truth, any plane limited to AIM-120s will be forever doomed as long as AMRAAMs remain so mid
1 Like
With how they modeled aim 120c i truly expect them to also mess up aim 120d
7 Likes
And FC3 modules has much lower price but ways more enjoyable, especially F-15C and Flankers.
1 Like
That’s why I said current euro mid as in the current euro fighter we have in game since the EX would be better than it since they both would have the same weaponry at the moment, EX would still be worse than the rafale but it would put up much better of a fight against it compared to other 14.3s
It needs more simmering, more smoking, tenderizing, sous vide until really everyone is raging hard about the issue, then like the second coming of christ they will release F22 for a small sum of 120€ as a premium of the premiums. Offer you can’t refuse.
1 Like
Do you have more info on this, some sources? I saw this a long time ago but didn’t bother researching, would make for a nice bug report since AFAIK the Starstreak was never meant to be installed on the British AH-64s
How? It’s slightly heavier than the F-15E, anything to do with slow speed the Rafale will still fly circles around you or be quicker to get nose on/HMD lock on you in any 1v1 scenario. Your only hope to “put up much better of a fight” is to literally shoot 3+ missiles at one Rafale and pray one hits. Similar to Su-30SM gameplay really, so just more of the same from the POV of a Rafale player
This is really my issue with anything that gets added short of F22 or F35. Unless they fix the weapons we currently have or we get better weapons u.s. will remain mid at top tier air.
1 Like
Was it ever armed though?
no but that hasn’t stopped warthunder devs before
Was it intended to be armed? The Yak-141 was.
that’s kinda the point of an experimental aircraft if they went with the designe it would be armed
F15 active can’t even have a gun as it would just shoot off its own canard
could carry gunpods like all the other f15s can
and it might not, the gun on F15s is mounted about where the canards were but I imagine they could just mount the gun slightly lower, would risk hitting the canard when its pulling neg Gs but thats not too common and could just be solved with an interlock
3 Likes
no gun
F-15 STOL/MTD was to test the feasibility of making/modifying aircraft to land at lower speeds and on shorter/worse runways. It was as combat-oriented as F-16CCV, which is to say not at all.
i don’t see how this even contradicts my original statement. what about testing for lower landing speeds and shorter/ worse runways is not combat-oriented. do you think its for commercial use??