Do you not understand what "as needed " means?
7 Likes
See, they can’t rely on MUH 5 HULLS and then things become so confusing to them their brain breaks.
I guess “The amount of DU in the armor is unlimited per the NRC License” isn’t clear enough for them either.
Fetal alcohol syndrome is a real problem for them, it seems.
6 Likes
they got that K5/ Relikt ERA tied around their heads too tight.
6 Likes
Yes. He does. But it still won’t help him. Remember, when the turrets were authorized “as needed” it obviously meant it was in turrets. Gaijin came to the same conclusion.
But then when the SUB-1536 license was amended to remove the explicit 5 hull limit for DU in hulls, and was granted the exact same “as needed” authorization status as turrets in the same line item in the amended SUB-1536 license…“WHAT DOES MEAN?!? IS NOT SAME!”
6 Likes
I dont know what the issue is. do we need to go to General Dynamics Land System Home Office and get a signature signed from the Board of Directors? lol
I’m not sure that would do any good. They can’t comprehend something the moment it doesn’t suit them. Doesn’t really get more official than the government licenses. I remember that was the basis on which the Wehraboos were making a stink when trying to deny congressional reports.
3 Likes
Swedish diagrams claim the M1A2 should possess 600mm RHAe vs KE @ 60° frontal arc.
In-game M1A2 achieves 612mm RHAe vs KE @ 60° frontal arc.
Swedish diagrams claim the M1A2 should possess 900mm RHAe vs CE @ 60° frontal arc.
In-game M1A2 achieves 926mm RHAe vs CE @ 60° frontal arc.
A further diagram claims only 50% of the turret surface provides 600mm RHAe vs KE when viewed from 20° side view, in-game the M1A2 exceeds this number.
3 Likes
Gaijin has to keep the U.S Tech Tree held back, they haven’t give nthe Apache its armor Piercing D.U Rounds, they haven’t added the AH-1W, because we all know what Zuni rockets do to Tanks.
2 Likes
Funny, as you can’t seem to prove them to begin with.
1 Like
The Apache doesn’t have “armor Piercing D.U Rounds”, it’s primary round used (and that is currently in game) is M789. Apart from that, there’s a tracer and HE-I round, both of which are also in game.
There’s no reason for the AH-1W to exist in game. You have the AH-1Z. Sure, it would be interesting, though there is no reason to with the current AH-1Z.
Ah, yes, you’re trying to debunk sound information of the limited testing of DU hulls with a document with emphasis on the word “probably”
Noodle was talking about the 2A7V there fyi.
https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/land/pgu-14.htm
When i say Gaijin PURPOSELY KEEPS THE AMERICAN TECH TREE NERFED, TO GIVE SOVIET TANKS A HIGHER CHANCE OF Survival I MEAN IT FOR A REASON. I told smin this over 2 years ago.
2 Likes
The AH-64’s M230E1 can load DEFA 30x113mm AP rounds.
The M230 cant take 30x173mm my dude.
7 Likes
Let him cook (already cooked).
No reason for the AH-1W to exist? Right right, there’s also no reason for any vehicle in-game to exist at all with that logic
1 Like
I don’t know if you’re joking, or genuinely this stupid.
I want you to use this fantastical device of all-knowing-knowledge that’s in front of you, and show me the caliber of the M230.
After that, I want you to show me the caliber of the GAU-8/A.
Then, I’d like you to tell me how either of these are relevant to each other in any way