who ever did it was not a regular to the area, they cleaned up the entire site covered their tracks and left, most likely was either a chinese team or a russian team testing a A.T weapon
They didnt even fixed the position of Hydraulic Pump,turret ring,Side turret armor protection and bulkheads. Do you seriously expect them to add Spall Liners bro?
nope…
Exactly, just stop playing with Usa until Gaijin decides to buff them.
a RPG 7 cant penetrate a abrams side armor
It’s a good tank. If you exclude the Strv 122s/2A7s, which are just in a tier of their own in general, the M1A2 and SEP are legit top 5 of the remaining MBTs. You really don’t have the game sense, acquired by both skill and experience, to understand the gameplay of top tier and what makes a tank op, good or meh, no matter how many video’s you watch.
If you exclude the good tanks, the Abrams becomes good. Wow.
Last time i checked those Tanks faces Abrams.
Yeah and every other tank, like a T-80BVM or a Type 10, will perform just as bad against a 2A7 and Strv 122 as an Abrams will.
Age old question is still: how can someone who’s highest tank is the OF-40 Mk.2A, and who can’t really go positive in any of their tanks, tell what is good and what is not good at top tier.
EDIT: apologies, your highest tank is the Centauro I 105. Point still stands though.
Same as above. These tanks also face, and shir on, BVMs/Type 10s/90Ms etc just as much.
No matter a Spall Liner or DU armor, people will just aim for the turret ring
the turret ring isn’t properly modeled in game.
It could maybe be stronger but it will always be a weakspot
It shouldn’t be a weakspot at all if it is properly modeled, every APFSDS >90 mm is too big to fit there, at best it would disable the turret ring and maybe slightly spall, while APFSDS <90 mm just wouldn’t have enough pen to even go through, even if they would physically fit.
Currently Obj279’s 130mm APCBC can go right through that turret ring.
That is physically impossible but according to Gaijin its realistic…
Not true, some will most definitely perform better than others.
Without getting into Italian matchmaking/lineups, I never said I was an amazing player.
Assuming that all players in this comparison are of the same skill level. A BVM or Type 10 will get stomped by a 2A7/122 player of similar skill just as hard as an M1A2.
Let alone the CR2/3, T-90M, Merkava Mk.4s, Leclercs, VT-4 etc. Those tanks will easily get stomped a lot harder by a 2A7/122 than the M1A2/Type 10/BVM get.
this isn’t quantifiable. Type 10 and BVM can win against 2A7 and 122 tanks. It isn’t that crazy. same for abrams. Just saying, abrams is less likely than the BVM and Type 10 to actually do anything. I don’t want spall liners for it but just saying that the advantages of the other tanks outweigh the abrams.
I don’t know about all that, the turret ring is pretty big
How big do you think modern APFSDS penetrators are?
105/120/125mm penetrators have widths in the 20-26mm range.
They rely on being thin to force energy into a smaller area and long to provide penetrative power.
It wouldn’t penetrate the side of the turret where there is composite armor, but the side of the hull is only steel + side skirts. That’s why they installed ERA for additional RPG protection in urban environments.