Funny how F-15C which is a better platform than the Su-27SM is somehow worse performing than it
Also 11.0 which is like what? F-5E vs MiG-21bis? Yet US players still do worse
11.3 is even funnier because at that BR it’s the MiG-23M, Su-24M, and MiG-27s (before br adjustment) vs F-4Es
Edit: I just checked, it’s Su-24 and MiG-27K (before BR adjustment) vs F-4E holy hell
my aim120 seeker heads just aren’t locking things right in front of me even traveling at me or my tws will prioritize all the missiles that have already been fired over aircraft after the update i have no idea why
TWS+ borked radars across the board
Good grief ANOTHER Bias cope post? This update really drew them like moths to a flame.
It’s a bit strange that a LOT OF unfamiliar people keep creating the same topic over and over again,
while some of the SAME people claim this is absurd.
Don’t you find it stange?
If Russian bias was real why isn’t Russia the best nation at every BR? I can see the KH-38MT argued but the CAS playing field has been leveled, though Russia is still the best.
As for Pantsir, maybe, but this is more Gaijin being reluctant to introduce Two-Part AA systems. May be a little bias there.
We are not talking about every BR.
We are specifically discussing top-tier USSR vs. USA.
US Top Tier > USSR Top Tier.
M1A2 SEP > T-80BVM
M1A2 SEP > T-90M
The US has many more competitive tank spawns than the USSR.
ADATS < Pantsir
American CAS < Russian CAS
Russia does better in the air department, not on the ground.
The teams ruin your experience, and that is something you can’t really change.
Ground looks like that
Better?
Doesn’t that prove US Players bad despite the decent Tank? Can you show us the German and Swedish WRs please
US ARB > USSR ARB, and that is fact.
Russian Top Tier is only strong due to their CAS.
Why do we talk about German or Swedish?
Did Hornet update add aircrafts to these nations?
you were comparing GRB WRs?
I mentioned it already
You have to compare all nations cause it’s not only the US that gets affected by the change. Or are you ashamed that Italy with an Ariete does better than US teams?
@SmothyHleb why do you always ignore other perspective to the close air support problem, and when other nation besides USSR do even better in air realistic battles and ground battles (reads France)?
This is a biased perspective in fact, if you can’t see how good other nations actually do when proving that there’s no Russian bias in War Thunder you just forget about the fact and screenshot only two nations that part of their players are unskilled, when USA got the majority in this subject.
It’s not bias, the problem is not how the vehicle works, the problem is how players use them.
I feel like the point of game balance is to buff the struggling side and maybe nerf the winning side to make things even.
And not to artificially nerf the loser even more, which isn’t even realistic by the way
Pantsir has no counter other than the player of the Pantsir being trash.
AGM65 outranges it, but travels slow and the Pantsir player easily missile spams incoming AGM65s.
Then, the Pantsir can rearm using the ammo supply.
Why won’t Gaijin let US and allies have AGM88C? It would be a legitimate counter to Pantsir.
Hypocrisy, this is what most of the players claiming existance of Russian bias (with zero proof) wants.
Its not a good plane but is still questionably low, maybe they knew the bad players would be magnetised to it