It would be helpful to have a direct channel for communicating with the developers.
I’de like to add to this with this document at page 95
https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/74xx/doc7461/08-02-army.pdf
the fact it makes the distinction between HA and DU by referencing all 3 and 2 generation iterations when talking about the AIM and M1A2/M1A2 SEP I think should be more than enough to prove HA does not mean DU and shouldnt be used interchangeably
What’s the difference? It’s gonna make the tanks go up in BR if they get a buff.
They could also just undo the reload buff, see what happens first.
Isn’t that enough of a reason for the Abrams to get it? If it’s “technically compatible” then won’t that be enough?
If not, how come non V4.5,6 Ah-64E gets the JAGM and how come all Ah-64Es get the DIRCM?
Is the standard different for tanks? If it is, why does the Taiwanese M1A2T have the KEW-A2 round since it hasn’t been exported to that nation?
Is there a dev blog talking about the standards using when making changes to a vehicle? I’m a bit confused if there is any since, it seems to be applied when convenient. I would much rather have the devs say “it’s for balance” rather than “historically accurate” since they seem to flip flop constantly.
1 Like