Wait really?
Yep, it used to have at leasr 800mm against CE ammo. Now it only has 600mm
Always been 600, just that it seem to do more than 600 in game before, like I could sometimes eat 9M133s but it in theory has always been 600, feels like hornets are easy pen now although no idea whether that is armour nerf or ERA nerf, maybe a bit of both.
This all nerfs happened to ztz99a is really sad, players want the new model with improvements and buffs, but they got a nerfed tank with a bit smaller lfp but nerfed at all.
They fixed armour of ztz-99a on the dev server or no?
Good work
Just a question, the chart in box 1, what is origin of source and how do you know that one was of 99A?
Really good work, but we need also buff the ufp armour
Very high quality post, well done.
I made a post about how the left armor cheek is weaker than the right one a while ago. I’m surprised not that many people have noticed it, we should bug report it to Gaijin.
It’s this one.
someone once mentioned this, but gaijin refused to admit it. and absurdly demanded that we provide evidence.
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. The x-ray model of the turret composites are literally the same size and thickness. Maybe we should try again just to see what they will say this time.
They accepted a lot of things provided to ztz99a/vt4a1 but didnt fixed it yet
I would say that Gaijin wouldn’t even bother to fix while laughing at Chinese players
Classic Gaijin moment, they accept many bug reports but only fixes what they want.
Also im curious, i recently bought Al-Khalid and lower frontal plate seems bigger than it should be, is it accurate or not?
If you are talking about the model size of the LFP, it is accurate. But the composite armor array is incorrect, the Al-Khalid and VT-4A1 composite armor should extend more downwards toward the LFP region, similar to what is in the hull of a Leopard. The overall thickness of the composite armor is also incorrect.
Yup, i was talking about its size.
Not surprised, Gaijin failed again.