Discussion on ZTZ99A model errors in game

First of all, are the GAIJIN staff really playing games? Have you done any research? Have you counted the number of Chinese players in this game? From night to early morning in Asia, almost half of them are Chinese players, and almost every Chinese player will develop Chinese technology trees.
Just because you treat Chinese technology trees and Chinese models differently, many of my friends have given up on krypton gold. Or choose to leave and see what VT4A1 is like. Look at how weak the 99A and ztl11 wheeled tanks are under the same weight. Which 11.7-series helicopter has an 8×8 mount? ? ?(The so-called “heavy armed helicopter”: Z-10) Do you really have a balance?

Don’t ignore the enthusiasm and ability of Chinese players to top up money. This is absolutely beneficial to the development of the game!

2 Likes

Your developers have said that they have not mistreated the Chinese system, so please reflect and modify the bugs in the Chinese system

1 Like

Why haven’t these errors been fixed yet?

2 Likes

I can understand fixing the modelling errors for Chinese TT needs time, but why would Gaijin not even like to do some copy-and-paste work like adding APCBC for PLZ-83.

At this point they are probably holding off all of the modeling changes since they have to implement spall liners and the the new internal modules.

This error is very fatal in the game, as it greatly weakens the tank’s combat capability. This error makes China’s main battle tank bolt more fragile than other main station tank bolts in the game. Moreover, China’s main battle tank has the longest loading time in the game, which directly leads to its vulnerability.

2 Likes

We need to correct the modeling errors of the Chinese vehicles pointed out by the player,this is a reasonable request for all Chinese players.ZTZ99A and VT4 are the worst tanks for this BR.But gaijin still don`t pay attention to the voice of Chinese players ,which is discrimination against some player.

4 Likes

If those tank are not modelled properly i agree that they should be fixed (especially because china Is One of the Nations i’m planning to grind)
But are you aure those are the worst mbt at their br? Because beign worse than the Ariete Is hard to believe

I would more than certainly state so, but only given the right conditions. In urban maps, the C1s with their 8-12x optics can hardly search and fire at all, on the other hand, at this range the weakspot of ZTZ99As became very noticable and everyone did learn to shoot them in the LFP as well. In a standoff against Russian designs, the C1s will be proven more successful as CL3143 already has a chance at penning critical weakspots, but against strvs and L2s, the ZTZ do have an adavantage for using ATGM, which no one brings. At the end of the day, the C1 handles a lot smoother and thats what matters for most players.

2 Likes

I agree with both hands, well done我双手赞同,希望ztz99a的问题能够修复,希望中系的内衬也能尽快出

3 Likes

I agree with both hands, well done我双手赞同,希望ztz99a的问题能够修复,希望中系的内衬也能尽快出,希望中系的其它问题也能得到妥善处理

3 Likes

I agree with both hands, well done我双手赞同,ztz99a的问题应尽快修复

1 Like

agree!!!

2 Likes

i am agreed

2 Likes

if it isnt russian, it wont be fixed fast lol

Who cares? Anyway, there is no competitor of the same type, the voice of the player is always ignored, Just look to Escape from Tarkov, they only care about their own interests.

This is a very serious modeling error, it very much affects the strength of the carrier, I just hope that Gaijin can fix it as soon as possible

2 Likes

It doesn’t need to be. Gaijin has acknowledged the report which means we will get the fixes eventually. As long as the vehicles are fixed in the end, I am happy and I think many others will be too. Until then, I will just not play Chinese top tier, since the VT-4A1, ZTZ99A and WZ1001 are all affected by this.

I do also hope that we can get a post like this discussing the VT-4, though, since its problems are even more egregious.

2 Likes