i really hope the 201st squadron gets added as an additional camo option since theyre the squadron responsible for leading the strikes in iran. they were the first to strike, they striked the most and got out of iran last. would be incredibly cool if it will be added
2 Likes
More IDF squadron camos, decals and pfps should be made available, there isn’t remotely enough representation of Israel in game, even a giora epstein pages of history would be great
1 Like
also an addition to the python 5’s… the python 5’s can be used with the LITENING BM pod to gain lock instead of IR. think of it kind of like laser(?) or tv(?) guidance… i cant really explain it since its pretty classified but all i can say is the python 5’s can use the LITENING BM pod to gain lock instead of its IR seeker, possibly completely negating countermeasures.
1 Like
Would likely be slaving the pod to search for targets in the IR spectrum, then designating the Python seekerhead to look at said target and use it’s LOAL feature to extend range, definitely sounds like a feature, one especially useful against stealth
absolutely agree with you. more squadron camos absolutely need to be made available in game and be made as default instead of the unmarked camos that are found on alot of lower BR aircraft on the tech tree…
whats medium altitude, like 5000 m?
I believe you mean the Rafael Stunner. It’s been tested on the F-16I and it’s a TVC missile with IR and ARH homing iirc, but I believe there’s controversy as to if it can even fire the missile and it’s believed to just be tests without firing it. It’s a surface to air missile that had its booster removed before being mounted on a Sufa.
100km is its stated max range, which means that’s likely assuming a launch at 12km+ altitude.
a little advise for the ones who dont know but right now the sufa its also overperforming because it weights 8930 kg now, and its real weight its 10000kg 10 tons to be precise, soo… like i said before expect this jet to be even worst than it is right now.
It’s engine is also underperforming, so expect it to even out a little if both are fixed.
1 Like
According to… What?
Yes I do. Thank you. I just know it as python 6 which was it’s name very early on when on an aircraft. It’s also been tested on f15I and f35I
It’s never been designated that, maybe you saw a nickname or someone calling it that online but it’s not. It also hasn’t been tested on the F-35I or F-15I, on the F-16I. Don’t know where you got that from, but maybe I’m wrong so if you have sources I’d love to see them, but if it were true I’m 99% sure I would have heard about that by now.
according to “what” you say??? according with the IAF mf how according to what LMAO what a clown. https://www.iaf.org.il/645-en/IAF.aspx
this is the official web site of the IAF only israeli people have access you cannot enter to it.
they also remark the weight of the plane with missiles and fuel and it is 12.8 tons and the maximum takeoff\touchdown weight is 23.5 tons.
Yeah ur right. Different missile in the picture. Just looked a lil closer. Sorry bout that and I heard some second hand about the f35
1 Like
Than you should know with the increase of the weight and the proper increase of the engine power it should be performing about the same way
Is there any evidence that can prove the inner side pylon of f16i can carry 4 of the spice250? Is it ok for f16i to carry at most 16 of the spice250 in total?
A report was made, but no evidence exists. It’s been denied and likely will never come unless images emerge or specifications of the ability to carry 16x come to light. For now we’ll have to settle with 8x Spice 250s and 2x Spice-1000s.
actually it would perform worst at lower speeds because of the heavier weight and gravety being a thing when the jet is slow is slow the engine would have a huge hard time even with a little more of thrust the PW229 IPE performs better at higher speeds not low speeds.
yea thats my report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Bsb60InDhovs
got a NAB for this
1 Like