NOT a BUG LMAO
Had a feeling. Well, hopefully, either an image shows up with an F16 holding them later on, or Gaijin randomly feels generous like they did with the Mi-28 and Iglas.
Found photo of Spice-250 on F-16 inner pylons
4 Likes
I was just trying to find some info about spice 250, when saw that photo on that site: УАБ SPICE-250 поступит на вооружение в 2019 г.: oleggranovsky — LiveJournal
(i dunno how, but i made that)
its not an inner pylon(
but on the other side it is (ig so), because dropped spice-250 is a bit of close to aircraft
afaik f16 cant carry fuel tank on only one side. If it has it from this side, its got it on the other side as well. The problem is you almost never use something but fuel tanks on inner pylons of a falcon. This is why its so hard to find a photo of it.
(this logic doesnt work for ussr tho. Gaijobla doesnt have to prove existance of kh-38mt)
1 Like
nvm, that’s me dumb a bit (its third and fifth pylon
Should’ve been there for the Baz Meshupar Debacle, absolute horrific job on the end of a certain bug reporting mod
1 Like
Yikes, and promotional mockups can be used for full blown implementation (KH-38MT)
3 Likes
I made a bug report vouching for python 4s:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/qH68Kcl7HFoS
kind of a hail mary though
1 Like
Not a bug, as expected… Guess they want the sufa to be DOA
well thats fair enough, it might be TOO OP if py4 added on the aircraft for now, at least Americans still using their aim9m instead of the aim9x
Pyton-5 is the aim9x counterpart.
1 Like
python 5 can counter like every modern IR missile.
2 Likes
Python 5 isn’t anything special but it also isn’t bad at anything either other than maybe min range due to no thrust vectoring (although it still pulls like a menace if it has speed off the rail)
actually thrust vectoring makes your missile lose more speed, thats why it doesnt have one
2 Likes