Until we see a Nation without an entire rank between ranks
Yea the first 3 ranks, not having a rank 1 and then jumping to rank 4 do you know how ridiculous you sound?
Makes way more sense to not have a rank 1-3 than having an entire gap between 2 ranks
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
???
Guy’s either move it to DM’s or leave each other alone also, I would advise not to bring anyone’s country of origin into the subject.
1 Like
it seems you still don’t understand. what’s the top of france? rafale. in real life, does france have anything else, or even plan for any other fighters other than the rafale? no. let me give you a short brief of the france tech tree. mirage 2000, belgium f16, and rafale. unless you’re playing for the mirage 4000. which, i bet none of us is willing to play hdn only expermiental plane at 13.0 with only 530d’s that don’t work because of the plane’s radar.
what does isreal have? mirage 2000. f16, f15, rafale. quite literally the exact same planes. the audacity to call france a copypaste nation is crazy in my opinion lmao. who invented the 2000’s and rafale then, greece? please, lets speak without our personal bias and facts. if greece gets added, it will be the entirety of france tech tree along with isreal. i don’t mind up until mirage 2000’s, since taiwan has it.
IF, rafale does get added to greece, then it has to be balanced. like 6 mica’s and no hmd. because that’s what rafale f3 is in real life, both french and greek. gaijin gave rafale 8 mica’s and hmd, because it technically can. but can greece? no. they were never sold the scorpion. they will have to add the targo hmd, which would be ridicilous.
have you ever thought why people would play france? for the rafale? well guess what, greece has the EXACT same rafale. but just with more aircraft. oh you want the mirage 2000? guess what, greece ALSO has it. greece is a copy paste of france, and there needs to be some sort of balancing if they add the rafale. which, i am completely against. it should have mirage 2000’s only.
1 Like
i js got here didn’t see your message mb
Vehicle: CM34
Game mode: Ground Realistic
BR: 9.3 → 8.3
Reason: The CM34 is badly overtiered at 9.3. It only has a 30 mm autocannon with 114 mm APFSDS and no ATGMs. Meanwhile, the BMP-2 at 8.7 has a 30 mm autocannon plus 4 Konkurs ATGMs, and the Type 89 at 9.0 has a 35 mm autocannon plus 4 ATGMs with 700 mm penetration.
The CM34 has excellent mobility and thermals, but against MBTs it is completely dependent on side shots. There is no reason for it to sit above both the BMP-2 and Type 89 at 9.3. 8.3 would be much more appropriate.
By percentage French TT has multiple duplicate vechicles, Specially American planes and Tanks
Nahh it’s more USA copy paste in air
Then why you care what nations does people play? It’s an individual choice that everyone makes. In real life you can find Rafales in multiple countries so as WT is a realistic game it’s normal to see the Rafale too all the countries that operate it.
You want to move it BELOW the BR of the Type 87 RCV (9.0)?
Maybe re-think your analysis.
@Smin1080p_WT are there any plans to give rwr’s such as AN/ALR-46(V)3 or ARI 18241/1 better target identification? there is at least one report about AN/ALR-46(V)3 Community Bug Reporting System but it has never been answered in 2 years and planes such as F5TH TCU, Kurnass 2000 or Tornado F3 late that are already not the best at their br struggle even harder due to not being able to identify enemies or even if the radar locking them is from a fox3 or a plane radar
yeah mate you’re right the type87rcv doesn’t even has a stabilizer or thermals. Has a crazy cannon that melts tho. I’d say 8.7 would be fair dinkum. It’s still below the type 87, the thing is- the cm34 is a huge box, doesn’t even have spall liners at the front of the turret where most of the crew is located, that goes for the us m1296 and the south african badger
Sure the CM is bigger than the RCV but, it has everything the RCV has AND…
- LWS
- Laser Rangefinder
- Optical detection
- Better Optics
- Better Pen
- much better reverse speed
- 1 extra mg
So the RCV is smaller with better ROF. Really don’t see how those 2 advantages make it better than the CM.
You should reconsider asking for giant changes like this, they will never happen
Because we care about the game and you don’t?
now i dont know if this was mentioned in this thread before but i was told to come here why does the br matchmaking have to be 1.0 would it not be easier for br compression if matchmaking was a .7 br diffrence
1 Like
Agreed.
Changing from 3 step difference to 2 steps would solve a lot of balancing issues.
1 Like
M163’s in nuclear thunder are so ungodly accurate… whats up with that, how come they consitantly shoot munitions whilst moving at 50km/h in covoys
Sounds like you’ve never played assault mode.
The aim-bot on enemy bots allows them to shoot down A10s with roof-mounted mgs.