i think you made a mistake
i dont think anyone is right here
because 0.4kg A II is not sufficient enough to become HEAT
0.8kg of tnt is extremely low, like ww2 heat low
bruh
man
i dont know anymore
i dig further and further and more rabbit holes are found
do you think these are all decoys documents
because every document stated differently and nothing is right
im honestly losing it
yeah like thats what im thinking
but like base on ur calculation
0.4kg Comp A II is not enough at all to blow up obstacles or have enough explosive to deal with armored target or helis
its basically rpg-4
which make no sense
mpat is used to deal against fortification, light vehicle, helicopter or low flying target
but low explosive mass wont cut anything
yes but it has proximity fuse that can reach 10m radius
also i think theres plenty vid of it shooting stuff and its way lethal
so im honestly dont know
i cant find anything else
Same propellant type yes, but not same amount. It’s very likely the APFSDS rounds use more propellant, this can also be seen by their obscenely high chamber pressures (with a lighter projectile too I think).
Anyway there’s quite some conflicting sources on M830A1 I guess…
The Northrop Grumman brochure also gives a different weight. And the M1002 brochure (practice round) says it uses a different propellant altogether, so it’s rather useless as well.
so many sources, so many different statements, so many different numbers, measurements, calculations, i did a fact check and m830a1 use 2 differents packages, etc…
but in the end m830a1 is gonna perform worse ig…
its good irl tho
yeah but then we dont know what is the irl one like
and mind you rn its not really good either
i frequently try to use it against helis and they deal basically zero dmg
crit and they still flying