Yes and no.
If it was a Canadian-built M16A2 it would be licensed built but it isn’t listed as. It’s more like Canada rebuilt the M16A2 from scratch, ironically this is listed to make it closer to a prototype variant than the production one. From what I’ve read on it.
So well you can argue the C7 is an M16A2 it still doesn’t make it bought from the US in any way.
uhhh- wrong screenshot?
If it says it is a licensed-built M16A2, I’ll admit I’m wrong(and what I read was wrong) but I don’t see that there. It’s just list everyone who bought the C7s and C8s.
Oh, I see it. I’m, in the wrong. ya, it licsend built. Don’t know why it isn’t listed as such elsewhere.
Yeah still Canadian rifle in a terms but it’s a license built. Goes along the same terms as the ACV that is just a license built piranha.
The grizzly was built in Canada
Where did I say it wasn’t?
The skink is just in time to get one shot by Yak-9 APHE
Rejoice!
Good question
That thing on the bottom is an abomination and we should kill it with fire before it lays eggs and multiplies further.
Isn’t that payload right near the antenna? Looks like a EO/IR sensor.
Just remember this stuff when we yoink all the US gear out of other trees in air. Many top tier nations jets, gone.
While I am for nations having their own stuff, only. I recognize it doesn’t make for great gameplay. I think a lot of people make an argument like you but don’t consider or want it to be applied everywhere, only unilaterally.
no, but 2 extra 12.7, better mobility and better protection do. the grass windows would not be that much of a weakness. it does not mean the gunner will stick his face to the window. they are much lower, the head barely standing out of the armor side. and the sight is right in front of them. it was only designed to let them see the sky, not the ground. the gunners there will not be any more exposed than the gunner behind the M45 turret on the M16 MGMC. and it has the advantage of at least preventing the overpressure from the small HE rounds. so good luck getting a headshot of the commander and loader. i would put my bet on punching through the armor.
see what happens when I compare it to the SPAA of the same type… 6x 12.7mm is pretty much better than 2x 20mm of the WW2 level. all will depend on the turret rotation speed. and i expect it to be something like 60°/sec
I would say it depends on the SPAA. All of the 40mm equipped SPAA that lack proxy rounds really struggle with hitting planes but does quite well when used as if it were a light tank (Mostly because of the comparatively low fire rate and inability to blanket cover parts of the sky).
So some SPAA really do perform better when used against tanks.
At least in my experience.
yes it is an EO/IR Sensor,
but then it would not fire the derby missle, more likely the python 5.
since to launch the Derby with only an EO/IR sensor, would mean WT must implement a system for vertical launch and lock on after launch guided by the EO/IR sensor,
because if i understand the fox3 current ingame correct, they get thier initial guidence information by riding the radar beam of the TWS or Radar lock until they reach thier own radar distance, the SPYDER would fire the derby up and must guide it without radar to the intendet target, which the missle locks onto, which could work, but then the missle should lock on the first radar signature it picks up, since there is no radar based confirmation.
if we come to the conclusion that it should fire the python 5, well we do not thave the python 4 ingame jet, therefore python 5 missles are daydreaming at its best
Just like the Puma. They will eventually raise the Puma to 4.0 while remaining rank II.
I guarantee it.
“by the community”. Not the mods.
You can read more here on how it works:
As if I believe that. I had plenty of perfectly fine posts with lots of “hearts” being hidden by “the community”. Usually happens when I call out company hypocrisy or disagree with a mod.
This time it was because the C(disease) word, wasn’t it?
One shot of the 45mm APHE, or even some overpressure from a nearby rocket. Cya!
It’s got similar mobility to the M16 MGMC.
People already have no issue aiming for small glass panels, I’ve experienced that enough in the R3.
Which isn’t surprising seeing how the M16 MGMC has 60 deg/s and the Crusader AA Mk II has 70 deg/sec.
So we can shut up about Australian Abrams’ and Canadian Leos in the UK tree, because neither were build by Australia nor Canada?
Well that sucks
The Skink uses US built components. At the minimum, the engine and transmission are built by US companies.
The US has more to do with the Skink than the French did with the SK105, yet Gaijin added the SK105 to the French tree after forum meltdowns.
