3.3 is a pretty good lineup. I play it every now and again. Just not as good as the 6.3 one.
Ok, now you’re just making things up because you got proved wrong.
A website is a website, a nation sells its domain for money. it being a .com website shouldn’t invalidate it.
Also, I used WIki as an example because it is a collection of common knowledge.
I’m sorry I hurt your little Yanky feeling with the fact that Canada pulled as much weight as a major nation during WW2 due to its status as an independent nation that was given to in it 1931.
5 Likes
I do the US has a excellent 3.7 line-up
2 Likes
The M24 is criminally good IMO
So good they had to reduce it’s rank to Tier II so it wouldn’t be spammed for events
3 Likes
I have this for a 3.7 line-up and that is why I wanted a SPAA around 3.7 that I could use with it.
US 3.7
if they pulled as much weight then they would have been considered a major nation, they contributed not nearly as much as the US, USSR, or UK
The US made it so no matter how much weight Canada pulled they couldn’t be called a major. The forced it to be illegal to call any of the dommion a a major.
On top of that, the US would cry until every glory Canada could have gotten was theirs.
2 Likes
still didnt pull nearly as much weight as the US, USSR, or UK
Canada has like a quarter of the people of those nations, it couldn’t put as much in. 10% of the population took part.
The US made it so they couldn’t be called a major. As they hated the idea that Canada could be strong and independent.
The US uses those deals to block Canada from buying weapons. Canada pulled it, weight, the US made so that wouldn’t be known by stealing their glory.
3 Likes
what deals? and what do you mean, Canada is a pretty big US arms customer
This one:
Also big customer? wha-? no, it is not. We don’t use majority of US stuff. More is domestic, Belgium and elsewhere.
The only thing that is primarily American right now is aircraft.
3 Likes
I have yet to see the addition of vehicles or gameplay features start anything other than an argument.
isnt the infantry rifle basically just an m16a3
No, it is not. Its development paralleled the M16A2 but it isn’t a M16A3.
The C7/C8 is domestic (that is news to me). There was trading of info during development but it’s two different guns with the same answer.
Machine gun barrel heating is a nice addition:
1 Like
thats been around for a while now, time flys
Shows you how often I use 50 cals!!
its a thing for every ground automatic weapon, very evident on the m163
or that either - nor on various other light AA that I do use - will keep an eye out
The C7 is a licensed colt rifle. Canada was present during the Marines testing for development of upgrades to M16A1 hence the large similarities. But for all tense and purposes the C7 is an Canadian built M16A2.