[Development] Rank IX Aircraft and the F-16C Block 52!

There is no way F-16 could get more than 6 missile unless they add the Tripple AMRAAM rail that was supposed to be on F-21 (which was never made)

It didn’t though, either gaijin put it at 14.0 or it is thangless

Thanks for the answers. So us top tier air is still cooked lol

1 Like

We are getting like a whole line of WW2 planes + many other WW2 planes across other trees + several WW2 vessels + a Skfz and a Japanese thing

2 Likes

well not really AIM-120D will be pretty good, the only missile to match it would be the Mica-em
R-77/R-77-1 are no way near it

I’m being nit-picky here but the Block 52 isn’t. That goes to Block 50/52 PoBIT / Block 70/72 which is what this should be if we are getting AN/APG-83 SABR.

2 Likes

Its 14.3 lol

which I don’t understand why they haven’t gave us the Blk 70

1 Like

its 14.3

It’s 14.3

Also are you planning on modelling Have Glass V in the future considering you have chosen to model this after a Block 52 which has Have Glass V IRL?

2 Likes

Because U.S. doesn’t have any Block 70

Turkey requested triple racks for their F-16C fleet along with the new F-16 Block 70 order, according to the Federal Arms Sales Notification.

There is a patent for it as well.

The US is upgrading their F-16’s to the same standard as the Block 70/72 through PoBIT.

2 Likes

I start to worry about its RWR gear

Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.

We haven’t seen the 120Ds performance yet. People said the same thing about the 120C and it’s among the most mediocre ARHs in game, if not in the bottom half performers. R-77s and R-77-1s have time and time again proved themselves capable, as have rather obviously the MICA.

4 Likes

I know it 14.3, it should go to 14.0, I don’t know why it is even 14.3
when the AIm120D not going to be better than the AIM120C-5’s

They can add the R-77M 👍🏻

Oh, more good news. But we might not get to see it on American F-16

R-77M is not needed

1 Like