You’re comparing a Fox-2 missile of the 1970’s,… to a Fox-3 of the early 1990’s?
Where were you in History class, my man,…
Technology → different
Type of guidance → different
Size → again, different,…
Intended use → shall i say it again?
Huh?
You say?
Ok,… ok,… i’ll say it:
It is DIFFERENT
Who is comparing anything?
I just pointed out that the “range” means literally nothing, as everyone knows R60 max range is around 2-3km at best.
Not 10km as stated in statcard.
So the apparent 75km AMRAAM range is irrelevant when talking about this game.
I thought using " made my comment pretty clear, but i guess not.
10km is possible when:
Firing it at high altitude 8km+
To an ennemy situated below you of about 3km difference altitude,…
→ it is all about LAUNCH PARAMETERS
but since you’re not taking care of that,… how would you know.
Seems you still have a lot to learn ^^"
Bud just stop with that passive aggressive insulting.
I know it depends on the situation, but that situation literally never happens in WT.
When have you ever launched PHOENIX from 150km?
Theoretical and practical range are different things.
So it’s irrelevant, like i just said.
Well considering 99% of players are only going for “Rush mid” in tank/aircraft/[whatever],…
But you can think that you’re right,… having convictions is great if it helps you, you know?
So,… take it easy,…
But next time you got a 75Km AIM-120 Range, and then talking about a R-60 → this is wrong, and basically is a comparison,…
Even more when more comparable Fox-1 (SARH missiles) do reach the range they have on their statcards,…
You taking it one way doesn’t make it that.
I’m done listening to your condescending ass.
you are arguing against nobody here, also if hugging the ground was so effective why are r-27er some of the best top tier weapons?
done listening to him because oyu know hes right
Everyone isn’t hugging the ground 100% of the time, because you actually have to fight back sometime. D’uh.
It’s literally guaranteed to fail radar missiles.
except its literally not
If he made his arguments without sounding like an arrogant asshole, then sure.
But right on what actually, as i never claimed the things he is trying to disprove…?
Bud your top jet is F4E with 0.7 k/d.
Your word on toptier weapons is worth absolutely nothing.
And now i’m gonna kill your arguement:
Custom battles Are not integrated in stats of a person, therefore you can’t know how much time he spend trying to fight 12.3 aircrafts.
So basically reaching to the stats of people is just a fluke,…
It is,unless it is launched from plane above you atleast few hundred meters and the missle coming from above.
Depending on the range it is still possible to do it crash on the ground
Does that make your statement any less wrong? Cope and seethe.
No, but it makes your argument less right lmao.
I won’t believe dude who used E2 sparrow in 100 games or so, when i know for a fact that i have more experience than you.
You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:
Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.
I would recommend people do as i did and just stop discussing with him. Its pointless.
Or just use actual arguments, instead of