[Development] Collecting Your Ideas for the 2024 Roadmap

n°1 for the roadmap having devs who listen to the community is working on other nations too is everyone will be happy 90% in game it’s the same nations america russia germany the others it’s very rare given the The answer we don’t have on the reports is the sloppy work on the other nations, it doesn’t surprise me that some are starting to abandon the fact that it will change one day we do everything to have a good game we report the problems etc. community is excellent but behind it it doesn’t follow when you have 40 reports but none of them has an answer or even there is always the same sentence it’s not a bug I think that when we spend hours looking for information is that in the end we don’t have this sentence it can irritate some people and I totally understand I also understand the fact that you have a lot of work but see the problems that everything speaks it’s always the same sentence that comes out that is starting to become annoying not to be listened to there are lots of things that should change if you want to talk come in private messages and I will tell you it’s problems thank you for taking the time to read this message

Please start using diacritical marks. Posts without them are virtually unreadable.

1 Like

like the reports they are illegible

The problem with 14.7 would be that it would leave a lot of areas of the game still feeling somewhat compressed, IE cold war in ground/air

1 Like

Not really because most issues would be solved accordingly by some of those BR upgrades but also by REMOVING some of the stupid rules about attacker aircrafts (namely A6 /A-10 /Su-25 under 10.7 current BR)

2 Likes

No, it wouldn’t. It would heavily decompress the game to where I do not need to fight an MIG-21 or F-104 in an early 1950s-era plane that lacks the actual measures to deal with the missiles they carry. Cause Offensive countermeasures(HVARS and their equals can only do so much).

Another thing F4 Phantoms will no longer have to face Generation 3.5, 4, and 5 aircraft that it has trouble effectively engaging.

2 Likes

I mean, problem with attack aircraft like the ones you mentioned is balancing between ground and air RB. That’s a whole other situation, so I’ll leave it be, but aircraft around their BRs definitely need more space. IE, F-1 and F-104J at 10.3 with no flares and bad maneuverability while F-5C gets flares and excellent maneuverability.

Not to mention, yeah, as the above poster said. Stuff like the T-2 that gets to fight 8.7s like Sabres with missiles lol

T-2 is fine, that’s one of those cases where you can deal with them. Since there not necessarily great in speed, or maneuverability and keep a battle exciting but its fighter version the F-1 should not go to that same BR.

1 Like

Even for ground ability,… those aircrafts are efficient enough to be useful even at 12.3 ground RB,…

The real problem is that they’re “slow” so people are not able to use those aircrafts correctly against fighters → which is not what they have been designed to,…

For the rest i’m with you → but 14.7 would be enough to space them out enough

1 Like

T-2’s only really beat in speed by the F-104s around its tier, can pull decent first turns, and gets 9Ps against Sabres and other comparable aircraft.

To me the 9P is to put it soon in higher BR,… because it’s flight performances alone can deal with MiG-21 MF and SMT,…
(But all MiG-21’s are too low in BR especially F-13 and PFM variants)

Yes, it can get Aim-9P however it’s nowhere near comparable in performance to the F-104 because it’s a Trainer aircraft. Aside from that 2 Aim-9P’s aren’t going to help much. But I agree it is still never the less formidable. It would be fine at 9.7. But that’s just me.

pit axis against allies in realistic battles

3 Likes

Rework top tier MM, currently All vs US makes no sense. It should mostly be all vs russia…

Getting a custom bomb series would be nice. I’d like to be able to select exactly how many bombs i want dropped, not some preset figure…

Against aircraft that are slower than it is no. F-86s can turn if its fighting them they will struggle even if its going as fast as they can they will still need to turn. However for vehicles like the MIG-21 and F-104 yeah good luck in fighting with them. Unless it’s flown by a dumb player.

that’s a great idea, I would love a game mode like that in ARB

My original pitch was for an increase in Air Sim rewards but at this point, just a new developer/studio. Like c’mon Microsoft, Gaijin has got to be pocket change to you.

2 Likes

I would suggest to add the original cockpits for the low tier planes that currently have placeholder ones. It’s fundamental for immersive gameplay and the attractiveness of the simulator mode overall. At the moment there are even great premium planes like the Ta 154 A-1 that are left with horrendous placeholders, which is a shame. It would also be an investment into the advertisement of the game: At the current state every YouTube video about the Ta 154 or the Do 217 E or other planes that look horrible from inside will make the game look cheap and unrealistic in the eyes of potential new players (and customers).

Air RB EC. Unlimited spawns. Preferably without tags to set it apart from standard ARB.

4 Likes