Guys, if you want to suggest something related to upcoming roadmap, please use link provided in article.
2 Likes
Even though I know it is useless and a waste of time, yesterday I already sent a suggestion on this topic.
Great, where can I find this information? Link?
At what point have I told you to go play WOT?
I pasted in the wrong quote above, sorry, but you said “it seems that people want to play WOT and they don’t know it, they want to avoid realism”, basically the same as “If you don’t agree with my shell accuracy suggestion [which I already said I don’t], you should go play WoT”
You just have to play, play 100 games with one and then 100 games with another, and see how many times you died and the enemies you killed, it’s that simple.
What I mean is that people LOOK LIKE THEY WANT TO PLAY WOT, that doesn’t mean I say go to WOT, and of course I want them to implement the correct damage model, and if gaijin goes crazy and implements it ,and that’s why there are 80,000 players who don’t like it and leave the game, well, fine, let them close when they leave, but I’m not going to say that they go to the WOT, if they change it, those players will do whatever they want, and if they gaijin Don’t change it because they won’t leave.
No I don’t just have equal skill in every vehicle type, know all the meta and skills etc equally.
If I don’t usually play with AP rounds, for example I’d be much less well versed in the exact crew positions of all enemy tanks I face, because I haven’t spent a long time practicing and memorizing that specifically relevant information. Someone who mains AP very well might have and could have thus become equally effective.
MY data won’t show that.
What I mean is that people LOOK LIKE THEY WANT TO PLAY WOT, that doesn’t mean I say go to WOT
Okay fine, whatever, misudnerstanding then
I don’t have a word look for yourself.
Latest Machinery of War Discussion topics - War Thunder — official forum
How can i edit mine? Or make a new one?
agreed with this. custom CM loadouts would be cool too
1 Like
So idea is very simple : make ahead to work (lock on target or radiofuse). Matchmaking may be more variable if one nation won’t be fight with all other.I wish you more intensive and fruitful interaction with the community, not just finding the next way to get more money
I would like to see more east german tank like the t-55am2b, it’s one of my favorite tank
I submitted my improvement idea, but what are the chances that solving the aircraft spawn system issue in GFAB is going to land in the roadmap? It’s like the only thing that arcade players are talking all the time about and posting various suggestions here on the forums and on the old forums.
This one issue for arcade, everything else can be focused on other modes, but just one issue for arcade players that should be handled on the roadmap. We had various suggestions that were never passed to devs, apart a low hanging fruit of removing markers for fighter planes, which is an improvement, but still not a full solution.
Extending BRs for all modes to at least 20.0, then decompressing would help a lot.
As it is now, vehicles like Japanese rank 6/7 jets, most non-US BR 3.7-5.0 destroyers, and US Rank V would seriously benefit from it.
1 Like
Afaik you cannot.
I’m for decompressing BR, but a decompression of current game up to 14.7 is enough
And that’s what i ask for.
2 Likes
n°1 for the roadmap having devs who listen to the community is working on other nations too is everyone will be happy 90% in game it’s the same nations america russia germany the others it’s very rare given the The answer we don’t have on the reports is the sloppy work on the other nations, it doesn’t surprise me that some are starting to abandon the fact that it will change one day we do everything to have a good game we report the problems etc. community is excellent but behind it it doesn’t follow when you have 40 reports but none of them has an answer or even there is always the same sentence it’s not a bug I think that when we spend hours looking for information is that in the end we don’t have this sentence it can irritate some people and I totally understand I also understand the fact that you have a lot of work but see the problems that everything speaks it’s always the same sentence that comes out that is starting to become annoying not to be listened to there are lots of things that should change if you want to talk come in private messages and I will tell you it’s problems thank you for taking the time to read this message
Please start using diacritical marks. Posts without them are virtually unreadable.
1 Like
like the reports they are illegible
The problem with 14.7 would be that it would leave a lot of areas of the game still feeling somewhat compressed, IE cold war in ground/air
1 Like
Not really because most issues would be solved accordingly by some of those BR upgrades but also by REMOVING some of the stupid rules about attacker aircrafts (namely A6 /A-10 /Su-25 under 10.7 current BR)
2 Likes
No, it wouldn’t. It would heavily decompress the game to where I do not need to fight an MIG-21 or F-104 in an early 1950s-era plane that lacks the actual measures to deal with the missiles they carry. Cause Offensive countermeasures(HVARS and their equals can only do so much).
Another thing F4 Phantoms will no longer have to face Generation 3.5, 4, and 5 aircraft that it has trouble effectively engaging.
2 Likes