I’m sorry brother but it really wasn’t It was horrendous leopards had better armor better mobility and better reload than you you were just inferior in every way possible and I’m pretty sure we had just the T90a we didn’t have the B3
The Leo2a6 was nerfed late december or early january which is roughly 1-1.5months after release.
The B3 was released before the T-90A. The T-90A released the same time as the 2a6.
More importantly; so was the 72AV TURMS.
just turret front
T-80U go forward faster as reverse well you have to ask Russian engineer why don’t put it in tanks even most Japanese everyday cars has it
Real reason 2A6 stomping yeah
Ok then my bad because that time was horrendous
I mean if we gonna go like that then it’s not my problem that US doesn’t have a good whole armour just blame US engineers
But look here the point I’m trying to make is everybody suffers at some point it’s just how gaijin does things
Maybe they do? DU hulls insert? but gaijin just don’t give them
see a lot of bug report
some says they do have hull insert some says not
well, it really hard to say in this case
Well from what I’ve seen DU hole inserts were just suggestion with 5 test beds as a proof of concept to upgrade the armour
I mean I personally haven’t seen anything mention the upgrading whole armour until the sep v3
Ngl, thought this was going to be another “Neveragain TFH” or whatever his name is post.
Then you’re not looking enough, there are whole government documents proving it does for all the way back to at least the original m1a2, it’s been a discussion topic countless times, but still not accepted.
We need the USA tech tree to be updated they have to USA top tier in 2008 tech everyone else haze there new tanks and IFV the USA is stuck with BS NOT fair our tank are not modeled correctly our tech tree is horrible other nations has better versions of our own vehicles
We need to whip out the SMIN01080
“Here take this”
“+1 cope”
Found it:
Ok let’s say they even upgrade m1a2 with a DU armor what is that going to change you understand if they do that and the other shells cannot penetrate that type of armor just going to add more powerful shells which is going to negate the DU armour and then we are back at the start or maybe even worse because then you would have bigger weak spots
1 Like
Imho that was always their goal (at least since they decided to put Mach 2 jets into the game).
As said before - earnings - and players tend to flock to vehicles & nations with high WRs. On top of that WR is the most popular way to steer & balance f2p games from gaijin’s perspective. The MM which creates lobbies based on certain nation combinations plays an important rule too.
You might be not representative for all players. War games are usually seen as competitive games and wt is nothing more than a vehicle based shooter.
Edit: I was wrong about Mach 2 jets - gaijin said in 2018 that they wont add supersonic aircraft:
The DU discussion is really only the tip of the iceberg when you are talking about changes to be made. And mind you, the other changes are not as big but would sure up some of the weak spots, which have already been accepted months ago and haven’t been implemented. Things like volumetric accurate turret ring, UFP and armor around the driver correction (fuel tanks) as well as side armor values. All documented, all proven, all submitted and reviewed. I won’t go into spall liners because that’s a topic that is widely debated. But saying that it shouldn’t get its DU hull upgrades because round could still go through it is not a reason deny them. Things like shots at angles could then get deflected better, no more turret ring kills from WW2 guns and auto cannons going right through the ring, etc. Also, even if the shots pen, the spall from going through better armor would not look the same or as large.
1 Like
Just US Top Tier Ground? You sure it isn’t the game as a whole?
The thing is, as shown with the SEPv2, LAVAD and F15 E, even if you get more advanced things, if they don’t give the accurate values, shiny new toys don’t matter