The new aiming point for GNSS-guided weapons is still not working in matches (the test drive works just fine). It cannot launch a salvo and keeps attempting to lock onto something.
There is not a single point in my comment where I disagree with that
I personally feel like the Pantsirs weren’t really the biggest issue as the BUKs make impossible to even gain altitude as they are lobbing multiple missiles at you after take off. Making it extremely hard to go for ground targets.
I’ve tried a lot of different strats to counter the BUK but I have not found a way…
It certainly doesn’t help that AGM-88C just don’t have enough energy to reach the BUKs and if they do even come close the BUK just intercepts 100% of the time.
Meanwhile red team can fly a lot closer and higher to the battlefield and just launch KH31-PD’s which consistently reach and destroy the SAMP/Ts simply due them not having to worry about incoming missiles directly after taking off, the SAMP/T having a singular radar (while the BUK has multiple) and due to the KH-31PD’s superior speed (The big one).
I think swapping out the AGM-88C for AGM-88G AARGM-ER would help quite a bit with regards to the speed / energy problem making it a bit easier to target the BUK. Alternatively have the BUKs marked on the map by default so blue team roughly knows where they are.
The solution I prefer NOT to have is removing the KH-31PD as that would the game more insufferable for red team as well.
1 Like
Revise the Merkava and Namer armor modifiers.
The Merkava Mk.4 still has extremely underperforming armor, given a KE armor modifier as bad as rubber. This is known and accepted, yet nothing has been done.
Merkava 4 (all) armor values too low and mislabeled. // Gaijin.net // Issues
The F-15I also only gets 16 SPICE 250, while the F-15E gets 20 GBU-53. This is unbalanced and unfair for Israel.
3 Likes
Nobody cares. Trophy is broken atm. Did a few testing with fellow brits mains and we find out bugs. But devs are clueless
As for whether they want a missile with a Doppler pulse seeker on the F-14, yes, I think it’s pointless because it’s not necessary
It’s perfectly acceptable, given that there are premium vehicles that are very similar to, or even identical to, those in TT. We may or may not agree with it, but it’s simply Pay-2-Fast it makes it easier for players to get hold of something they’d otherwise have to complete the entire TT to obtain.
1 Like
I completely agree, but I only brought this up because the people in question only have three aircraft in the same BR range as the F-14, and they want to argue with me about notching and dealing with radar-guided missiles, when I have about 40 aircraft ranging from 14.0 to 13.0.
1 Like
Compared with Yak-130 the M-346FA should have SPICE 250lb for it FnF munitions, also it’s official standard armaments for M-346FA can’t see any reason not to adding the SPICE 250 for it.
Under some espect, this is indeed correct. Sometime you have people that have a ClicknBait Abrams but their crew was never grinded, nor their knowledge is for a BR12.
On the other hand, for me personally is mor kind of a nuissance than joy. But I have played suffiecient so that my tank crews are aced, my planes are aced, at least those that i have no bought and never used ;-)
I am Swiss, I served in the Swiss Air Force, therefore the US F-18 TT is not part of my interest. I have my F-18C Late in Germany. Blieve me or not, I have reasearched the EF but never used it. It just sits there.
Nations I don’t play, i have a few permium lineups in otder to complete season pass tasks. But I will never play or grind that nation seriously, because no interest, being this China, Russia, Italy.
I don’t have anything left to reasarch in France, Israel, Germany and Sweden. Researched, never bought and never played of course.
Around 6 or 7 years ago i wrote here in the forum that GJ should allow us to buy any vehicle in the TT without the need of researching anything. Well, still feel this way. If I want an F-14 one day, then I have no interested in researching a full tree which i don’t use. Waste of my precious time.
I am prety sure that others here feel the same. I think the premium are sometimes a good option. Not in all cases. Some premiums are really bad.
3 Likes
I fully understand
Here we go again, another humongous forum thread full of opinions presented as facts, with a few bits of constructive discussion drowned inbetween.
1 Like
Yup. Gonna be a slog.
1 Like
If F-14D is getiing AIM-9M so should F-14B.
Balance: It wont break the game, just make F-14B more pleasant to play. With or without AIM-9M F-14B will remain inferior to aircraft like F-15A or Su-27.
Historical accuracy: There are many photos F-14B / F-14B(U) with AIM-9M.
Moral aspect: If F-14B and F-14D will share same BR it be looking like ugly P2W.
1 Like
Also since this update is called hevay cav we should get all the model fixes/armor gaps fixed on all the other nation mbts.
Ahhhh F-14B got 9M same as D now. They at it together.
1 Like
Yeah, pay-to-win. Which plane’s radar is it? The plane looks exactly the same in the game.
It does, thankfully get the 9m, but it will still be inferior imo to f15a and su27
hey @Smin1080p_WT as the newest one of f14，it‘s pity for us to see f14d just like f14B.And it’s difficult for it to fight with su30mk2/k.So could you consider more about the weaponery of f14d？or better the performance of aim54c/c+ in the game.We need some replies about it.
3 Likes
And 7P too.
3 Likes