this suggestion is pretty much the forum’s “Bad Apple” or “Doom”, if it can be linked back to the Nation Folders, it will be linked back to the nation folders
3 Likes
No update on the Artevelde/Lorelei? It’s quite important to the Belgians and I think the rule about the same ship not appearing twice is a bad rule, especially for smaller nations.
Jean Bart is also a mistake imo, you should have used Clemenceau for the premium but it’s too late now since it also became a pre-order so people already bought it.
7 Likes
Would be nice for subtrees to get their ships.
Well, as someone who primarily plays ground, I have more stake in the Leo 1A5BE, but I so hope we see the Artevelde (Lorelei) in the France tree under Belgium.
The 1A5BE being moved is a minor organizational change that tickles a part of my brain; the Artevelde is a placement/oporator nation change that is a major victory, which would make me not have a major care about the Leo’s placement, if not getting it means we can get the Belgians one of their ships.
3 Likes
Ah so the new premium needs work or it wont sell. Maybe the CRV Boxer could also get it’s complete spall liners…
1 Like
I don’t usually brag too much, but you guys should have taken a look at the great suggestions made by @Mathll , so many Mirages left to add that would have been way more original, and really fit the French tree.
2 Likes
Yeah, I still think it should be changed in position, but definitely not as major as a problem as a Belgian Flagship being bound permanently to the German Tech tree…
10 Likes
just still don’t agree that the m1a1 aussie abrams is squadron vehicle, i get it doesn’t change much but its not need as a squadron vehicle as we already have one for high tier, would fit better in tree after the vickers mk7
1 Like
With the intent to force the F-14D to remain at parity with the F-14B is there any chance that the AXX-1 TCS of the F-14B will be implemented as a sensor, since the F-14D is getting access to the AAS-42 / AXX-1 combo EOTS / IRST blister under the nose modeled?
The report has been pending for a fair while now. And this would be the perfect time.
4 Likes
Yeah, Belgium really should get that ship. I wouldn’t mind if Gaijin simply stated that they’ll add the Belgian service version at a later date and let the Germans keep their modified version. That would at least satisfy the Belgian part of the community.
Even though this would technically break the “one refit of a single ship” rule, I think this is a justified exception. The Belgian version represents an important part of Belgium’s naval history, and adding it later would be a reasonable compromise.
3 Likes
Astounding, a case I made hasn’t been rejected out of spite.
Or apparently it hasn’t been implemented. These threats still cannot be engaged with Kh31.
You guys changed the wrong AA. The pantsirs were not an issue. They are pretty easy to overwhelm with a few GBU-39s dropped from up close using the new multi point targeting mechanic. The real problem was the BUK M3 spamming an infinite supply of fox 3 missiles at you from the second you take off from the airfield, while also being unable to take them out, because the HARM does not have the range to hit them before all of the missiles get intercepted.
5 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT sorry for the ping but regarding the PUMA rework, the armor part is gonna be exclusive for a future update or we will see at least some changes for this one?
I think it’s a mix of things for the Aussie M1A1.
With them liking it to the Ram II B, which is premium in both trees, I think Gaijin is trying to set a precedent with sub-tree/non-host vehicles will stay the same types as originally added.
Tho it’s also not like they don’t have options, with India having a few options (an Arjun variant (if pushing it) or T-90/Bishma they may or may not have) and Canadian Leos.
1 Like
Bmpt Needs Higher Br and armor fix
1 Like
Some interesting changes, the F-16AM change is quite major considering that DEV is already underway.
I hope that the changes introduced so far bode well for the Washington B.1 carrying British bombs rather than a US bomb loadout.
1 Like
I hope next week’s answer won’t just be evasive, otherwise we will never stop pursuing it
5 Likes
Just to share my excitement about the F-16 change, here are a couple of liveries that I’d love to see added.
I’m also wondering whether Gaijin is going to base the premium on the Dutch “MiG Killer” the only RNLAF aircraft to score an air-to-air kill since World War II. This occurred during the Kosovo War.
Closeup of the kill mark.
And I’d also love to see some of the cool airshow liveries that we used on our F-16s over the years.
But i do wonder what will happen to the existing Belgian camouflages for their originally meant to be premium F-16. Could we expect those skins to be added to the tech-tree F-16 instead, it would be sad to waste those skins the artist already worked on, if those were already finished.
7 Likes
Okay this legitimately doesn’t work. Kh31 lofts too much to hit them, and misses. Why is the search radar not on by default?
I agree. A MiG Killer would be great! Especially since that one was only recently placed in the NMM too.
Out of all Dutch F-16’s in RNLAF history it’s the most notable one and could be a F-16AM Block 20 so would be historically accurate.
https://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-16/airframe-profile/1966
6 Likes
just doesn’t make sense as who will want to squadron grind the same vehicle twice? if anything that would put people off doing that and they may as well make it a gold premium as that’s what people will do, i know i will as im not grinding the same vehicle twice for months at the sold rate of 20krp per 3/4 days
1 Like