[ DEV Server ] F16 blk 52 discussion thread

I’m abit confused isnt the F-16 we have ingame is an F-16C from the PoBIT upgrade program right, It should have everything an F-16V should have

Since it has the SABR Apg-83 radar

More non-burner thrust less burner thrust. So it’ll be worse for in game.

It’s DOA even if it gets full PoBIT and goes down in BR.

1 Like

the Block -x2’s engine has Higher 100% thrust, lower Thrust in full A/B so is worse for T/W slightly due to being heavier by 100lb too.

That’s why i want the triple racks, they’re its only hope tbh

Well, nobody knows. Gaijin does its shenanigans, introducing the Block 52 only as a matter to shut the USA mains and to “save” American top tier.
joaquin-phoenix-commodus

1 Like

99% of the time you are full afterburner in warthunder, so GE129 is better.
Tbh there’s little to none difference between a 8.9t airframe and a 9t airframe.

Not really. 4 extra 120s won’t really help it much with the state they’re in.

Funnily enough i tested 120D and it has worse close range performance and 2-4% difference in long range performance (time to impact of the 2 missiles were literally 2 seconds apart)


unrelated test of just the c5 and the D

1 Like

So it’s a revised PIDSU ( 3 Countermeasure magazines per pod) with the the option for the MWS & front end of the PIDS+ (RWR ball nose) mounted, should have 3D aural warnings too

3 Likes

Fully expected, but hey the Forum Moderators are still so adamant that “It’s still WORK IN PROGRESS guys don’t say it’s DOA, trust”

2 Likes

(the “GNSS” guidance is also useless)

2 Likes

Who knew that the US wasn’t actually upgrading AIM120s IRL, they were just downgrading them the whole time.

5 Likes

In what aspect can we expect a improved ALR-69A in WT?

Secret scheming by the lizard people.

I am currently updating the dev server so What is the F16C block 52 missing right now
I will name some that I know
GBU 53 Stormbreakers
Legion IRIST POD
Thales Scorpion HMD
GBU 54
PIDS

1 Like

Nothing relevant until ESM mechanics are added, so contacts can be handed off to sensors, datalinks and stores. otherwise it’s just the generic improvements.

The Core ALR-69A RWR is designed to improve performance
over the Air Force’s primary RWR system, the ALR-69, by
enhancing:

  • Detection range and time
  • Accuracy of threat identification
  • Location of threat emitter systems
  • Performance in a dense signal environment
  • Reliability and maintainability
1 Like

just some engineers stripping and pocketing a few copper cables, slapping a new letter on it and then being like “look guys new letter, new missiles much upgrades much wow pls buy”

1 Like

Either Scorpion or JHMCS II. JHMCS II is currently being used but Scorpion is starting to be fitted.

Guys look! It can carry 4 LJDAM’s (The US can now match the CAS capabilities of 11.7 aircraft)

7 Likes