F-16C block 52 missing Scorpion HMD.
[Dev] F-16C Block 52 missing Thales Scorpion
2 Likes
Dev Server Updated appears they fixed the canopy texture as well as the nozzle texture and both USAF roundels appearing on the top of the wings. Appears the thrust on the engine has changed as well from what the SUFA has now on live of 10350 kgf in afterburner to 11320 kgf. I do not know if this number in the x-ray was wrong on the SUFA and it already had that or they are increasing the thrust of the F100-PW-229 on the dev server.
2 Likes
oh nice it got accepted
Aim120B bug report got accepted. Best loadout would probably be 4 aim120B and 2 aim120D
Hey I have seen a bunch of reports for PIDS and others closed for various reasons so I made a new one since my other one was just closed. Please go upvote and/or add any additional info/pictures you may have. I am trying to get PIDS+ pylons with MWS. My last one was closed because they said there are no pictures of it so I tried to explain in this one that the PIDS+ pylon is the same as the one found on the Belgian F-16AM it just uses Elbit sensors instead of Hensoldt MWS sensors. Thanks.
F-16C Block 52 PIDS+ Report
3 Likes
Watch them slap “not a bug” on it and link that same report from 2 years ago like the other report had done.
4 Likes
Already closed “The Elbit America sensors require additional equipment to be installed in the aircraft and new wiring to the pylon. The presence of a flare/chaff pylon alone does not confirm the ability to install the Elbit America sensors.”
They must not even look at the sources how does it close that quickly. They are installing the AN/ALQ-213 on the PoBIT which this is now, and the sensors go into the fricking pylon that already exists its no different than the Belgian F-16. I cannot even with these bug report managers.
3 Likes
Some of the bug reporting managers are genuinely incompetent.
7 Likes
Yea I do not even know why I tried
Sufa has 10860 kgf in afterburner on the live server if you have all the modifications on it.
1 Like
[Dev] F-16C Block 52 missing Thales Scorpion
Damn, it got passed as a suggestion, at least they could give it a pseduo Rafale version or at least some kind of modified version from the A10C… Now it’s gonna have a HMD that it never had, lol so much for historical accuracy.
8 Likes
They’ll do this but not give it a triple rack, or 360 RWR, or MAWs.
Anything to gimp US aircraft and its performance.
11 Likes
Is there any photographic proof that a US block 52 f16 ever carried a triple aim 120 dispenser? I haven’t even seen a photo of any f16 carrying a triple aim120 dispenser. I’ve seen PIDS+ on US f16s, so it should get them, and its only logical that avionics from brand new upgrade have 360 RWR but aren’t the triple racks a crazy reach?
1 Like
no photos, just proposed for turkey but got cancelled. Honestly this plane wouldn’t be DoA if they made the aim120D actually good and it wouldn’t need triple racks
No. I’m being pedantic. Mainly because we don’t even have proof (that I am aware of) of the one Kh-38 variant and we get that on multiple airframes because “Russia needed it”. But regardless. Pedantic.
The other two however is frustrating. Very frustrating. Because we know it exists and yet it isn’t there. I can be hopeful it just isn’t modelled but in reality it’s probably not coming.
3 Likes
ok, show me a picture of an EFT with dual AMRAAM rails
how about an SU-27 and SU-30 with dual R77s
how about a J-15 with dual PL-12s
once you can provide all four of those your point might make sense
but there is no photographic evidence (or other evidence for most of those) for any of those configurations
so why do you expect the US tech tree to have to abide by other rules than the rest of the trees in the game
12 Likes
Is there an actual difference between HMDs in game, aside from visuals?