[ DEV Server ] F16 blk 52 discussion thread

Thank you for your help.

1 Like

Is this document correct?
120dddd1

1 Like

honestly they should just give it to people who reasearched the F16C its literally on the edge of being a copy slop upgrade should folder it

The new F-16C feels pretty fun to play on the dev server currently, but the overwhelming majority of the opponents I’ve seen have been J-10C, J-11B/15T, other F-16 Bl.50/Bl.52 and some 15C GE/18E sprinkled in. So not the best aircraft.

I dread having to fight Rafales, AESA EFTs and Su-30SM2s in it.

The full PoBit upgrade package should indeed be added, but the multi ejector racks should definitely not be added, as this is a pretty damn ficticious change. Not all aircraft should be meta.

This is a typical plane that could benefit from more decompression at top tier, but is currently a bit squished between 14.0 and 14.7 planes.

sure but in its current state it’s on the worse side of the 14.0s we currently have, never mind 14.3. An F16 with 10 AMRAAMs would be far from meta, but at least it wouldn’t a completely pointless addition and actually offer something new

2 Likes

which is why you’d suggest a lower BR instead of some fake loadout. The radar alone offers something new on an F-16 frame.

an actual F-16V would be better.

Any updates to F-16C blk 52 after todays dev update?

Problem is that Gaijin won’t move it down as long as the F-16I remains at 14.0.

shouldn’t it have 120 CM not 90

which is what i initially suggested? also I’d rather have a fake loadout to make the jet more viable rather than it being irrelevant at almost the same BR still having the exact same issues

Block 52 now got it’s cockpit and is confirmed it’s now a PoBIT upgraded F-16.
image

Still using JHMCS instead of either JHMCS II or Thales Scorpion.

7 Likes

yall support this
yo guys
F-16C Block 52 missing NCTR In MFD Page
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/N1qKSpSpyTKS

6 Likes

F-16C block 52 missing Scorpion HMD.
[Dev] F-16C Block 52 missing Thales Scorpion

2 Likes

F-16C Block 52 missing CDU MFD pages.
[Dev] F-16C Block 52 missing CDU MFD pages

Dev Server Updated appears they fixed the canopy texture as well as the nozzle texture and both USAF roundels appearing on the top of the wings. Appears the thrust on the engine has changed as well from what the SUFA has now on live of 10350 kgf in afterburner to 11320 kgf. I do not know if this number in the x-ray was wrong on the SUFA and it already had that or they are increasing the thrust of the F100-PW-229 on the dev server.




2 Likes

oh nice it got accepted

Huge respect to @joshje100 and @kizvy for creating these reports.

10 Likes

Aim120B bug report got accepted. Best loadout would probably be 4 aim120B and 2 aim120D

Hey I have seen a bunch of reports for PIDS and others closed for various reasons so I made a new one since my other one was just closed. Please go upvote and/or add any additional info/pictures you may have. I am trying to get PIDS+ pylons with MWS. My last one was closed because they said there are no pictures of it so I tried to explain in this one that the PIDS+ pylon is the same as the one found on the Belgian F-16AM it just uses Elbit sensors instead of Hensoldt MWS sensors. Thanks.
F-16C Block 52 PIDS+ Report

3 Likes