so gaijin want to add for some modern tanks this upgrade system to lock helicopters and planes and track…but much nato tanks in game ni have HE ammo with time fuse or others but irl have it same with merkava is cabable to fire atgm.
And for some tanks i search for irl have this system and this tanks no have irl or no source from this:t80bvm, t72b3a, leclerc S1,S2,AZUR, WZ1001E, VT4A1.
Others are accurate. And now t90m get a HE with time fuze but for others no?
4 Likes
Is there evidence that the FCS systems used in BVM/72B3 are different from that of 90M?
Merkava, VT-4, and Merkava all have timed fuze/proxy rounds.
challanger.type90,type10,leclerc? all have HE round or with time fuze? no only russia and china use HEammo or merkavas same need to add atgm…
2 Likes
I checked before posting, so no. Not at this time [if ever]
interesting u defent only russian tanks but the leclerc,vt4a1 no pl send me the website where is this data BVM and t72B3A have this system…
3 Likes
I defended nothing here really.
Just gave some data from the dev client for the topic.
I don’t like that feature, at least there definitely shouldn’t be any lead indicator.
Leclercs don’t have HE TF/VT, the only Leclerc that has a dedicated HE round is the XLR, other use HEAT as a multi-purpuse HE.
2 Likes
Wait so similar to how Abrams MPAT HEATFS works?
This especialy at top will not change anything top heli are to far and fast to be hittable mayby if it can be implemented at like 9.0 can help againt less advanced heli overall a good or at worst neutral meccanic
No, they just use it as anti-vehicule and anti-infantry, it does not have any kind of proxy/timed fuse.
Ah duly noted.
Shame not all tanks will get this feature, as many tanks like the Abrams and Leopards still rely on legacy systems that are based on inertial+laser lead tracking, unless Gaijin tries to implement such feature.
They should just give them “IRST tracking” because that’s how the system works technically. I’m not familiar with the Leopard’s FCS system, but I’m familiar with the Abrams FCS.
The chieftan does a great video showing off the FCS of the M1 in this video
I heard a former M1A1 tanker say that they are still using the old inertial track lase and lead on most Abrams, it is not a true IRST where they use contrasting temperatures to track the target. Leopards still use this system too, apparently.
Gaijin would have to implement inertial lead, but for in-game purposes it should just function like IRST except with a laser warning because it requires lasing and the inertial movement of the turret to calculate the necessary lead.
GHPC does a pretty good job at showing how this system works on M1 Abrams.
1 Like
You literally linked video that shows how much it doesnt have tracking. It has basically primitive angle following and shouldnt get tracking in game as that actually requires recognizing target and automatically following them
1 Like
No, I know that it doesn’t technically have IRST tracking, but in essence, the functionality simplistically is almost IRST. You laser the target, the tank computer gives you the correct lead. Since this hasn’t been implemented yet, and I’m pretty sure Gaijin has said that they have no plans on adding the MBT tank tracker, just like how the real M1 Abrams operates. Now, in the sake of gameplay over realism (to which Gaijin is very fond over), I think they should give the Abrams IRST track
if this is to be implemented as a feature to all tanks except the abrams and leopards, well tbf abrams have proxy HEAT, so theyre fine
but leopards gotta get EPHAG
Damn why do all the cool projects have to die out :(
1 Like
I wish we saw more of these experimental ammos for top tier MBTs, Abrams could get the XM943 STAFF, X-rod, XM1007 TERM and XM1111 MRM-CE/KE