This is great but will the Sea Harrier FA.2 get access to its guns whilst also carrying the AIM-120s like the AV-8B plus(es)? and if not, why are they the same BR?
Bro… ok
They have missiles similar to AIM-7E-2s
Impossible, the SHarrier FA.2 could never carry AIM-120s and the gun pods at the same time on the bottom of the aircraft. The AV-8B+ is just straight up better which is a bit silly in my opinion.
1 Like
The fuselage pylons can only take one or the other
1 Like
Then why are they the same BR, thats my point
Ask gaijin why F-15, F-16 still got arcade flight model?
Why AIM-120 with smallest fins can do a 180 turn and 40G overload while thrust vectoring missiles can do only 40g and 50G
It’s worst, just realistic
I agree with OP, Everything perposed in that list is next level Aweful. the WHOLE post is bad, you ask for specifics we will just screen shot your post and be like “this right here, all of this and point to the post”.
these BR changes are freaking HORRIBLE.
F4C is Trash, it has ZERO CMs, A radar thats useless under 50,000 feet or unless its looking straight up, and awful missiles. its already BAD at 10.0
the A10 and A6E should go down to 10.0 currently cuz they are sub sonic garbage boxes and 9Ls arent the old Flare Immune monsters anymore. the 9Ls are a crutch that these desperately needed and even that isnt enough because playing them is suffering. Also they need to go back down to 10.0 GRB, 10.7 is nuts. youre already fighting IR-AND radar Sams at that BR. 10.7 is too high and destroys the 10-10.3 line ups.
F4E is also trash cuz it has the same bad radar the F4C has, sure it gets better aim7s but u cant use them due to radar issues, so whats the point? this thing should go down to 10.7 not up.
Looking at the tech gap F4C is fine at 10.0 maybe even in-need of better missiles like 9Js and 7E1s
F4E Again yes it has better missiles but doesnt have a radar that can use them and it being a 10.7 would be good, but 11.0 is too high unless it gets 9Ls then it can stay at 11.0.
F4J/S are fine at 11.3 because they get even better radars and Fox1 missiles. though at this BR i do think they should get 9Ls
F105D is also fine at 10.0
IF anything needs to go up its the F104A/C, they should be 9.7.
Idk anyone who asked for this, your devs are tone deaf and out of touch.
WTF are they doing?
Now if you want to do some changes that are ACTUALLY GOOD, theirs alot of OLD and badly under-preforming vehicles in existing BRs that frankly need better weapons and modules.
Or you can do a Huge QOL update by Universally lowering Match making Battle Spread from +/- 1.0 to +/- 0.7 max. This is a much better change sense the tech gap in a whole 1.0 is insane.
I could give you a MASSIVE and very detailed list of good changes. If you actually want that id be happy to provide it upon request. But i doubt you have any interest in making the game better looking at these purposed changes.
I highly Urge you to SCRAP all of these changes as they stand.
1 Like
When normal BR Changes?
Goodness. This is an absolute mess. Some good changes yes, but the F-4C going up to 10.7 is a glaringly bad example of this change. The Tornados are now a mess, the A-7s a mess, Phantoms all over the place, F-16s misplaced, the list is long. I suggest junking this and starting over, individually assessing each aircraft’s strengths and weaknesses before publishing. Keep the 13.7 expansion, but the individual implementation is awful.
3 Likes
I would agree that both the AV-8B+ and the SHarrier FA.2 were both fine at 12.3 since it was a amazing spot at the time but with the introduction of 13.7 it would only make sense for the SHarrier FA.2 to have a lower BR than the AV-8B+.
2 Likes
Face of 12.3?))
In game, that everything/most of stuff makes by DOCUMENTS, “That doesnt matter”.
But theres still F-16D for example, Worser missiles, less of them, Near to J-11 level of sustained turn rate, only radar is better, ah yeah, how can i forget about RWR, that matter only in SB.
I think that the F4C should not be at 10.7, it has absolutely no flares and meh kit. Have some mercy on that poor phantom.
Yeah like uFo-16 max overload 11G with 3 fuel tanks, 6 mavericks and 4 AIM-120
Just like 5G in manual
Yeah, especially in realistic because with the ability to get new missiles in arcade, its less important.
The kfir canard are Saab j35xs are going to be stinkers after this one. 11.0 max
4 Likes
don’t forget air Sumulator battles
Looks like you cant read.
And lol, FCS not implemented in game.
G-lim is not full FCS implementation.
is this on the Bug report site? they generally only listen from there
China upgraded their RWRs on the J-11A but it wasn’t specified which so the SPO-15LM is ahistorical, the radar was indeed upgraded (to the N001VE) but Gaijin has some holy documents they are refraining to publish to debunk this and the J-11A should have LCD MFDs but it lacks this in-game.
The J-8F still lacks MAWS which it indeed have and the R-77 is underperforming more than the AIM-120 so don’t get me started with “b-b-but look at America!”.
So no, it’s not realistic lmao
3 Likes