Dassault Rafale - Variants, Characteristics, Armament and Performance

The TopOwl is adaptable for aircraft, it has also been tested on the Mirage 2000-5 and 2000-D RMV. But you are right the TopSight has also been tested

1 Like

Correct. French GoV confirmed F.4.1 added more MICA, not F.3R.

While the JHMCS is indeed from F.4 (considering its Scorpion and not TopOwl), TopOwl or TopSight were tested on previous Rafale’s, same case with M2K-5F iirc.

The C101 testbed (previously known as C01, which to my knowledge also lacks a significant amount of avionics, which can also be clearly seen on the pictures) doesn’t have a lot in common with production ones.

3 Likes

We have Magic + 6x MICA on the 5F thanks to the Greek mirages
If you want to disqualify export variants that’s on you

Don’t see the value of dying on this hill just for ideological purposes that are meaningless in a videogame like war thunder

6 Likes

THIS is cool AF Supercruise with 3 GBU24 + 4 MICA at sea level with 70% fuel.
image

2 Likes

i think the HUD is a little messed up

They put the Tiger HUD as HUD for now but the correct HUD should be coming

Does the map marking system let you salvo AASM from >30km away? Currently can’t get >20km with target designation from targeting pod. Trying to work out if the range is actually usable.

Has anyone noticed that Rafale doesnt produce any engine sound? After the small uptade i cant hear my Rafale’s engines while my other planes works completely fine.

It’s a possibility but will mean your AASMs will be GPS guiding as LOAL doesn’t exist in game currently. So pray your targets don’t move lul.

No, I tried yesterday with the GBU IV, 39, 48, 49 and 90 and all of them fall after 20km. It seems that there are the same limitations as for the designation pod.

I still hear Rafake they even starting making it’s proper engine sounds

# [DEV] Rafale C F.3R - Missing dual GBU-16 loadout

# [DEV] Rafale C F.3R - Missing Mk.80 series

4 Likes

Something must be wrong about my game then, perhaps sound mod causing some issues.

Weird thing is before the small uptade it was working perfectly fine.

Pain. Wanted to salvo them in sim

Can the Mk 84 be fitted where the AASM 1000 would go on Rafale F4 or F3R just doesn’t have Mk 84?

Same for me, it’s one of the first things I tried and unfortunately it’s not the case

Will there be any evidence?

Only Mk.81/82/83, never seen anything to back up Mk.84 out of my head.

They really need to unfuck the bugger all range on targeting when they’re giving us kit that can hit targets at 3 times the distance we can target.

2 Likes

I guess they keep this limitation to prevent planes from totally dominating tank battles, however with the announcement of more modern anti-aircraft systems next year I hope this limit will be lifted.